> energy is not created > energy is not destroyed Their

Dark propulsion

You wouldn't understand.

>>8509031
It doesnt violate it

It uses the electricity to excite and shut photons out the rear

For about 100w you get something like 0.0001N of thrust

IT'S A BRASS CONE
IT DOES NOTHING.

>>8509031
>their

it pushes off of the dark matter

>>8509031
b8

It converts radio waves into propulsion

Energy in energy out

>>8509031
Inelastic collisions transfer ample momentum in a system with boundary conditions equivalent to the milky way.

>>8509080
>can't tell the difference between copper and brass.
This guy is an expert. Literally failed at regurgitating that the COPPER FRUSTUM is mentioned in just about every article.

So is this bullshit? More 'free energy' nonsense?
because this seems like something that shouldn't be able to work. I'm skeptical. Seems like a hoax.

>>8509031
Thunderf00t did a beakdown
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCAqDA8IfR4

>>8509463
Most of his arguments were retarded.

>>8509479
All he did was compare power usage : thrust on the EM drive compared to more standard things

>>8509494
>compares it to chemical propulsion
>compares it to blowing on a scale
>LOOK ITS MORE POWERFUL

Engineering error.

>>8509494
Which is retarded.

The revolutionary aspect about the mEMe drive isn't that it will be useful anytime soon and take us to the far reaches of the Universe. It's that it literally violates the laws of physics. Our most basic ones.

Assuming the experiments are true, it doesn't matter if it produced 8 micro newtons of thrust or 8000. The fact of that matter is that thrust was generated, thus violating our known laws of physics. Period.

>>8509193
Consequences of erudite vernacular utilised irrespective of necessity

>>8509920
kek

>>8509109
This is what the inventor says, they just don't understand how.

>>8509893
>It's that it literally violates the laws of physics. Our most basic ones.
Stop repeating this dumb meme

It doesnt violate any of them

>>8509031
Doesn't the EM drive emit photons as the EM radiation resonates against the drive? How does this violate newtons laws?

>>8509986
Conservation of momentum

>>8510054
Photons have mnomentum, pham.

>>8510054
Put in 100w of power get 0.0001N of force

Photons have momentum, it's the same way those ion drives work except this uses photons instead of ions

>>8509036
I thought we agreed to call it dark momentum?