Hey /sci/ and /atheism/,
How can you support a belief system that literally suggests that pic related happened? Why would a dinosaur evolve into a chicken? The argument everyone says is that it's because the comet wiped out every other animal so they had nothing to eat but then why wouldn't they evolve back into a dinosaur once other things came back? You guys must actually be fucking retarted if you think that there is an advantage to being a chicken over a dinosaur.
>>8508771
Mutations over time, not exactly this but the concept is...
>Ones up on a time
>Trex has babby
>Has feathers
>Somehow feathers either make him more desirable, help him in some significant way, or are negligible by potential mates.
>Gene for feathers passes on, now there a bunch of trexes with feathers and a bunch without.
>Continue this for quite some time, old trex species dies out for whatever reason.
Etc, etc, until chickens happen. Simple enough correct?
>>8508771
if niggas was KANGZ then how come they no longer KANGZ?
>>8508771
Higher density of oxygen allowed bigger animals to survive, bigger is not always better.
>>8508929
Fuck off you retard. How is it that there legitimately exists a portion of sci's user base which so easily falls for obvious bait; truly astounding.
>>8508771
>literally
is some metaphorical notion of evolution I am unaware of?
>>8508951
>He doesn't meta bait by answering bait
>>8508771
Because I saw it myself, first hand.
There I was, staring into the (quite literal) jaws of death at the mercy of a Tyrannosaurus, thinking it the end of my expedition and career as a natural explorer, when all of a sudden it began to shrink down before my very eyes into a little ball of awkward, squawking feathers. I could scarcely believe it, but that my native guides were watching also and the filmatograph was running the whole time. Needless to say I was converted to Darwin's way of thinking in an instant.
And in an ironic twist, it was I that ate well that evening.