>tfw to intelligent too fall for the "dark matter"

to obvious too 1/10

>>8500080
Yep it's obvious bait but if by core theory you mean our current understanding of what constitutes a galaxy then you're surprisingly right, dark matter is exactly that: a filler name for something we don't know and doesn't fit with the model.

>>8500080
You're saying you're so intelligent that you have come up with a better theory of gravity than GR. Let's hear it then.

File: 1480250616028.png (208KB, 807x935px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 807x935px

>tfw to intelligent too fall for the "the maximum speed is the speed of light"

that would mean the earth would be drawn to where the sun was 8 minutes ago, and would sling out of orbit.

>>8500117
That a common misconception based on applying lags to Newtonian dynamics. The instability doesn't exist in GR. Regurgitating crap you heard on the internet without even researching it does not make you intelligent.

>>8500175
not an argument.

>>8500176
No, it's a statement of fact.

>>8500206
no, it's just a "no u"

>>8500208
You made an unjustified claim. I made a second unjustified claim because you didn't bother to justify yours. I wrongly assumed you might actually look it up but no, you're more interested in arguing about nothing rather than learning something and are too autistic to simply ask for a source.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/grav_speed.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_gravity

Dark matter fits within the standard model, Dark Energy not so much

We can't measure it or replicate it in a laboratory. No. You just have to BELIEVE in it. That's not science, that's faith.

Nothing wrong with having faith in something.

It is wrong to teach faith as "science".

>>8500584
This is actually a better bait, but still lacking.
Can't really anyone do better?