Was he really a great scientist? Or he is remembered mostly for his sassiness?
>>8496513
>Was he really a great scientist? Or he is remembered mostly for his sassiness?
Both. They;re not contradictory.
He actually was pretty damn good.
>tfw no measure on continuous path spaces but path integrals work anyway
Big fuck you to mathematicians.
sassy science man of his day
he said nanobots were possible
where's my fucking nanobots fakeman
>>8496513
Reading his book, "Surely you're joking, Mr. Feynman!" right now. Sounds like he was a pretty cool dude. Also, his work in particle physics along with his Feynman diagrams show him to be a more than competent scientist so I would say both.