Post scientific proof that the "calories in/calories out"

>>8494025
- Creativity: 0/3
- Style: 0.5/2
- Pic choice: 0.5/2
- Overall form: 1/2
- Effort: 0/1
Total: 2/10. Go back to meme school.

File: 1479077405359.png (40KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 633x758px

>>8494033
I'm not even memeing, are you actually saying that I could eat 1500 calories worth of candy a day and I would lose body fat? Where's the proof of that?

it's bro science

go eat 2000 calories a day of ice cream for a month and have your friend eat 2000 calories a day of beef and compare results

>>8494039
>>8494044
you would literally lose weight though it being horribly fucking unhealthy and frankly killing you

>>8494039
This guy ate nothing but junk food for 30 days while counting calories and lost 11 pounds/2% bodyfat

http://www.bonappetit.com/entertaining-style/trends-news/article/junk-food-diet-jeff-wilser

>>8494039
>Bitch, I don't give a shit thermodynamics
>I'm not even memeing
You're not memeing but you're asking for scientific proof without wanting to hear scientific proof. Leave /sci/ and go suck a priest's dick or something, you'll fit right in.

>>8494057
>you would literally lose weight though it being horribly fucking unhealthy and frankly killing you
>fucking unhealthy and frankly killing you
>killing you

so u b sayin' nutrition is complex and calories in/calories out is reductionist nonsense n SHIET?

>>8494025
>Post scientific proof that the "calories in/calories out" meme works

not possible
>implying that energy from oxidation = energy from metabolic processes

this whole calorie Kcalorie thing is a bad meme from primitive science.
the amount of energy in food as determined by burning it (look up how they determine calorie content) is an over-simplification of the amount of energy available. The metabolic processes that produce energy for us animacules do obey the laws of thermogodamics but they one heck of a lot more complicated and convoluted than mere oxidation. this leads to the problem OP points out;
the amount of calories I eat does not seem to equate to the work vs. weight gain equation

File: 1475008174086.gif (12KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 633x758px

>>8494066
So how do I lose weight then?

>>8494075
decrease intake
increase work output

>>8494075
look into keto diet

>>8494063
Nutrition is complex
Losing weight is not

>>8494149
go back to /fit/

>>8494141
>decrease intake
So count calories then?