What do you guys think about philosophy of science when it&#

I think it has nothing to teach which isn't completely trivial

>>8490563


How come noones written a 'philosophy of science' about something that really matters; like the fact that the peer review system is worse than useless by dint of the fact that its 'science by consensus'.

See the issue here is that instead of writing how how to do stuff like normal STEM, they write about how *people* are doing stuff. Only problem is, they're autists who don't understand people.

They should probably just stick to doing stuff and stay in their lane.

>every thing must go
>james ladyman
>ladyman

What about your last name bro? That shit needs to go.

>>8490656
Plenty of people in epistemology write about peer review

>>8490563
Torrent to book?

>>8490681


Not enough apparently.

>>8490716
Here's a PDF
http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/every-thing-must-go.pdf

>>8490726
Thank you so much dude.

I find it interesting. It's just annoying when it tires to force ethics into everything.

>>8490726
emil kirkegaard, you heard of him??

>>8490563

>tfw john ladyman

>ladyman