Why is the Copenhagen interpretation more widely excepted

>>8484697
Because it's easier to shut up and calculate than it is to actually think about things

>>8484697
>excepted

>>8484903
sorry, i'm baked but the question is valid, no?

>>8484697
>sorry, i'm baked but the question is valid, no?

Fantastic question. There is still research on pilot wave theory recently invigorated by viscous droplets acting as both waves and particles in a macroscopic sense. Great stuff. But mathematically and experimentally the statistic interpretation is much more useful. So, we use it.

Essentially that is what string theory is, the ultimately "pilot wave" theory.

>>8484697
It's all bullshit anyway so who cares?

>>8484963
>mathematically and experimentally the statistic interpretation is much more useful.

Pretty much all that needs to be said on the matter.

>>8484963
Thanks for the articulate explanation.

>>8484971
because people who are truly interested in understanding reality don't stop at, "It's all bullshit" rather, they gather as much evidence as they can for all sides of the argument and try to determine which one makes the better case.

>>8484697
Because the Pilot wave interpretation throws out locality.