What temperature does the body have to be suddenly exposed to

>>8477182
About 350

>>8477182
Can OP not be a JPEG fag?

>>8477182
How many fucking times has that picture been saved

>>8478033
> bout three fitty

>>8478120
>saving images degrades quality
RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>8478120
Bout tree fiddy

>>8478477

It's just like a VHS right?

>>8477182
Well its not the temperature of fire because you see people on rekt threads burning for what seems like minutes

>>8478120
>>8478477
It's the same thing with music and mp3s.

Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.

I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.

>>8478918
do you spit when you talk?

>>8478918
>Hearing the difference now isn't the reason to encode to FLAC. FLAC uses lossless compression, while MP3 is 'lossy'. What this means is that for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it's about 15kbps on IDE, but only 7kbps on SCSI, due to rotational velocidensity. You don't want to know how much worse it is on CD-ROM or other optical media.
>I started collecting MP3s in about 2001, and if I try to play any of the tracks I downloaded back then, even the stuff I grabbed at 320kbps, they just sound like crap. The bass is terrible, the midrange…well don’t get me started. Some of those albums have degraded down to 32 or even 16kbps. FLAC rips from the same period still sound great, even if they weren’t stored correctly, in a cool, dry place. Seriously, stick to FLAC, you may not be able to hear the difference now, but in a year or two, you’ll be glad you did.

isn't this rotational velocidensity?

>>8477182
I guess at about 100 C your body fluids start boiling so it's instant death from there.

Well OP, i think the reason why the ant is dying like that is because it's insides are cooking. If you hold the heat up to the ant for awhile it will start to curl up and maybe you can see it get darker

An ant is very small, they probably weigh less than a gram usually. A human weights 40-80 kg normally.

What temperature will be needed to cook that much mass of human guts to where they dont function anymore?

It's all an application of heat transfer. The temperature is probably 1000's of degrees fahrenheit. This type of heat will cause a human to probably become unrecognizable in those few seconds to exposure.