What systematic sampling errors could possibly produce results

>>8464445
Liberal bias

>>8464445
>systematic sampling errors
More like outright propaganda. Dems and women oversampled.

>>8464445
You can't get accurate results when you constantly attack one candidate and his supporters as being monsters.

>>8464445
squeeky wheels get the grease. most conservatives don't answer polls or talk about their candidate.

they just go vote.

political science isnt real science is why

File: 1455971606478-2.jpg (398KB, 837x673px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 837x673px

>>8464445
Statistics cannot account for meme magic

White people secretly didn't want to be erased. They just weren't allowed to say it openly because it's racist to want that.

I came to this board to get away from this bullshit. Enjoy living on planet Trump.

>>8464470
this

The Silent Majority is no meme.

>>8464445
You can't force people to respond to polls, and self-selection tends not to be result-neutral. And you can't force people to give honest answers.

>>8464458
> Dems and women oversampled.
That is incorrect. Actual voting rates for both groups matched those for the polls quite closely (i.e. more registered D voted than R, more women than men).