Do you find it easier to read physical books rather than reading them on monitor/e-reader ?
>>8444645
both sides are memes
>>8444653
Rosen's book is an amazing introduction to discrete maths. Of course it's not gonna be as in depth about each topic as a book that has the fucking topic as a title, but if you're interested in the field and want a quick overview of what the fields are roughly about it's a good book.
>>8444664
>stop being autistic
no.
just as easy to read, but having a physical copy makes it much easier to flip back and forth and find things
>>8444645
Literally the reason why i changed to mechanical engineering...
>>8444645
Yes, it's far easier to read stuff that's printed on paper.
>>8445491
Hahahahaha guess what m8? You need to know computer science in mechanical engineering now. Soon we'll be doing design at a higher level
>>8445760
You can learn CS in a year of self study.
I prefer the convenience of reading from a screen.
I like all three for different purposes. I like to own physical books and prefer the look and feel of actual paper as long as it's not shit quality. An e-reader is a lot more convenient especially for heavy books. I read on a monitor if it's a book that expects me to do things on a computer, usually programming. The easiest is definitely the e-reader.
Having a monitor is having your own light, but modern e-books need a 4chan-like quote system for when they reference back to previous pages.
>>8446033
If you spend 15 hours a day for a year you can master anything. that is if you're not autistic and watch movies/listen to music