Hey guys, I think that I can strengthen rule 34. Rule 34 states

File: FB_IMG_1477614955313.jpg (43KB, 480x583px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 480x583px

>>8443149
X is not a subset of porn of x.

Dumb ass.

I see you're taking discrete math this semester, compsci faggot

>>8443157
I should rephrase that: X is an element of the set of all porn of X

>>8443149
>Since X is a subset of porn of X, it follows that X exists
This is clearly false. Many porn genres are fantastical. For example, giant porn does not prove giants exist.

>>8443181
your ontology is fucked up

>>8443181
But it proves the existence of that specific, animated/ pretend giant in the porn film. Real giants obviously don't exist.

>>8443189
RIP, André.
You never existed, but you existed in our hearts.

>>8443149

Wrong.

If p then q, but if q, not necessarily p.

If it exists, there's porn of it. But there can be porn of things that don't exist.

If people are killed, they die. However, if people die, they might not have been killed, they could have choked or something.

>>8443796
>implying they were not killed by the food they choked on

>>8443800
I used it as an example, but I could word it better to leave out ambiguity.


If people are killed by a human being other than themselves, they die. However, a person dying doesn't mean that they were necessarily killed at the hands of another human being.

>>8443801
Apart from Andre, bless his poor tortured soul.
And they never caught the killer.

File: 1f0eabbc6d7d9eaa508f8819d9b86d5ba5635258_hq.jpg (10KB, 347x316px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 347x316px

>>8443796

Since I exist is there porn of Me?

>>8443161
Kek

>>8443887
Masturbating to this post right now.

Hawt.

>>8443796
Why specifically p and q?

Is this some Hardy-Weinberg equation shit or are you a placeholder nigger be using p and q.

Also how do you define non-living and living? By the biological definition, the medical or some shit you made up? Also what about inanimate objects are they non-living or are they different entirely considering they never died?

> if people die, they might not have been killed, they could have choked or something.

Why does this matter you don't have to be killed to die.

confused as fuck.

>>8443161
Oh you~