What category of nobel prize should be added? >Computer Science

what?

Alan Turing had more practical contribution than any so called "pure mathematician" of the 20th century

there is already the "turing award" for computer science which is already has the same prestige as a nobel prize

i would add a category for "sucking the most black cock in a single year" in which your mother would be a clear favorite, every year, even after her death

Biology seems pretty obvious.

There is Nobel Prize in Literature, and Literature isn't science. Thus, being a science isn't a requirement.

>>8437979
is this even a question? it's obviously mathematics

>>8437989
don't you realise that biology comes under physiology?

>>8437983
>Grothendieck
>Erdos
>worse than Turing
Nice meme, I watched The Imitation Game too.

>>8437979
Architecture

best tits

being black
maybe being a trans-woman

File: main-qimg-02feb9e8178b3765df336772d58dac92.png (11KB, 572x432px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 572x432px

>>8438034
>is this even a question? it's obviously mathematics

No need, there's the Fields medal.

>>8437979
Engineering in general. That was what Nobel contributed, after all

Kid's choice.

>>8437979
Geology

>>8438096

Not him but fields medal has the age restriction going on.

Add the math nobel so those who give a damn about Mathematics after 40 are given a chance to shine.

Field's Medal is good enough for Math. We need Geology

>>8438328
If you haven't shine before 40 you won't shine at all in maths IMO.

>>8437979
Engineering.

>>8437979
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crafoord_Prize

>According to the Academy, "these disciplines are chosen so as to complement those for which the Nobel Prizes are awarded".[1]

>[1]"About the prize". The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 3 July 2009.

>>8438328
For every math paper there exists a theoretical economics paper structurally isomorphic to it.

Just replace the jargon appropriately and submit it under the economics "Nobel".

>>8437979
>creating computers
>not deserving NP

please leave and never come back

>>8438036
He meant real world impact.

Wanking. There should be a Nobel for the most and furthest jiz-jets

>>8438034
>don't you realise that biology comes under physiology?
Not all of it.

>>8437979
Implying "literature" and "peace" are sciences...

>>8438728
The peace Nobel is such a fucking joke honestly, they only use it to push political agendas.

>>8438734
The 'Wanking' guy here. The Nobel prize was developed to reward individual effort at a time when people were still advancing in individual sciences.

Nowadays, scientific effort is a global collabortion of 100,000's of scientists across borders. Completely outated, and as you say, a lot of recent rewards are a joke. Obama.. for what? Supporting Al Nusra (an Al Queda affiliate?) perverse in the extreme.

It's last century and does not mean much now - unless you pawn the award of course.

>>8438331
>We need geology

No one has ever needed geology

>>8438749
I'm pretty sure the leads of the Nobel Price shit money so they won't let it die any time soon even if it's outdated and a total joke these days.

Mathematics obviously. The age restriction of the Field's Medal is stupid.

>>8437979
Engineering
Biology would be good if it weren't for the fact there's already a Medicine/Physiology and a Chemistry field already. Most Biology concepts can be covered in one of those two fields.

>>8438331
Earth and Space Science would be acceptable, but I wouldn't do a straight Geology. Of course, that would be limiting Physics by removing Astrophysics from the running for Nobels in Physics.

Everyone who suggested engineering: most of what an engineer accomplishes is proprietary. You really want Intel, Ford and Google to be an interested party to the Nobel prize?

It needs to be in something important like Woman's Studies or Art

Economics obviously shouldn't.

>the science that powers the economy, society and how the world works is not important
>not a real science
>t. College dropout

>>8437979
Computer Science

>>8438862
Economy isnt a science

>>8438034
They would just give it to an actuary or accountant anyway. Fucking Bob Dylan and literature

>>8438337
Everyone knows, you do your best maths <25. Then you start taking amphetamines

>>8438705
>buying parts off newegg
>assembling parts
>deserve nobel
bitch, please

>>8438757
>geology
It was important when we stoned people to death

>>8438838
>economics
psychology wrapped in bullshit wrapped in maths

>>8439215
no, it's math wrapped in psych.

Non-Medical Biology (Zoology, Evolutionary, Astrobiology)

>>8439203
no, that's what you do. We design the parts that are sold there, without us you wouldn't have the tools to type retarded comments like that

>>8439358
No, it's circular, retard. Don't be so myopic

>>8437979
There needs to be a nobel prize for pornography.

>>8439379
You sound as intelligent as flecks of dandruff. Some shouldered fragment I scratched away while solving some passing arithmetic

>>8437979

Wow seven /sci/ has that asshole edgy "autist" insult shit down, I need to get with the cancerous memes.

But seriously you're a fucking prick for yet again contributing it the spread of cancer.

>>8439952
Make sense.

>>8437979
Material science should be separated from physics.

>>8437979
One that I can win, maybe "shit posting on 4-chan"

Engineering

not even memeing here

>>8439952
Please rephrase this.

>>8437979
>What category of nobel prize should be added?

"Bad Goy"

>>8438749
>obama won the nobel for supporting al nusra

are you fucking stupid?

>>8437979
Since when is 'Peace' a science?

>>8440348
And then thrown in the trash

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_known_as_the_Nobel_of_a_field