>he hasn't studied in depth Knot Theory, Tensors, 4-manifolds,

File: kek_fermilab.jpg (260KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 1280x960px

>>8433828
>pure math

LMAO!!!

>>8433831
pure math > anything a brainlet like you is studying. it's the language of intelligence in its purest form, untouched by you plebs trying to turn the basic process of finding applications into its own field because you can't do it off the top of your head lmoa.

I know some really really really basic differential geometry, you know curvature, torsion, the Frenet frame.

I-is it good enough?

>>8433850
derive a quantum spacetime model using differential equations you have 5 seconds brainlet.

>>8433882
xd

>>8433828

I think that studying most of these subjects is not worthwhile in terms of productivity and is social signalling using complicated terms for subject matter, kind of like how cringey "sciency" mumbo-jumbo is put into movies and films to signal when a person is supposed to be super duper smart.

>>8433831

>participating in gay wars about the sectionings and classifications of science.

KEK.

>>8433850

If it's worthwhile for eventually getting substantive output, then no. Keep going until you have output or quit.

>>8433981
what the fuck are you even talking about. what is productivity in this context. productive to what? you realize all of this is actually used in mechanics/electronics right?

File: fit (3).jpg (169KB, 1000x953px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1000x953px

>>8433828
>being so insecure in yourself you pretend you know a bunch of stuff to people on the internet

>>8433981

>then no.

Fucking kek, I meant "then yes"

File: 1476847505244.jpg (70KB, 530x530px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 530x530px

>>8433981
>I think that studying most of these subjects is not worthwhile...
WEW
E
W

>>8433828
What a meme list.

>>8433828
>Knot Theory
>Nonstandard Analysis
>Large Cardinals
>Teichmuller Deformations

Nonstandard analysis isn't hard to figure out. It's actually easier than regular analysis.

>>8433828
>Knot Theory
nope
>Tensors
not even a subject, more like one chapter of a comm. alg. book
>4-manifolds
yup
>Alg. Top.
yup
>Diff. Geom.
yup
>Nonstandard Analysis
If you mean infinitesimal calculus done through shit like dual numbers, thickenings, etc. Then yes.
>Large Cardinals
nope
>Teichmuller Deformations
As in deformation spaces of Riemann surfaces? Then yes.
>Bifurcation Theory
nope
>Continuous Martingales
I have no idea what this is
>Ads/CFT
yes

>>8433828

he never studied

>Abelian von Neumann algebra
>Affiliated operator
>Amenable group
>Arithmetic logic unit
>Artificial viscosity (a numerical technique for simulating shock waves)
>Axiom of regularity
>Axiom of limitation of size
>Backward induction
>Blast wave (fluid dynamics)
>Bounded set (topological vector space)
>Carry-save adder
>Cellular automata
>Class (set theory)
>Decoherence theory (Quantum mechanics)
>Computer virus
>Commutation theorem
>Continuous geometry
>Direct integral
>Doubly stochastic matrix
>Duality Theorem
>Density matrix
>Durbin–Watson statistic
>Game theory
>Hilbert's fifth problem
>Hyperfinite type II factor
>Ergodic theory
>EDVAC
>explosive lenses
>Lattice theory
>Lifting theory
>Inner model
>Inner model theory
>Interior point method
>Mutual assured destruction
>Merge sort
>Middle-square method
>Minimax theorem
>Monte Carlo method
>Normal-form game
>Pointless topology
>Polarization identity
>Pseudorandomness
>PRNG
>Quantum mutual information
>Radiation implosion
>Rank ring
>Operator theory
>Operation Greenhouse
>Self-replication
>Software whitening
>Standard probability space
>Stochastic computing
>Subfactor
>Von Neumann algebra
>Von Neumann architecture
>Von Neumann bicommutant theorem
>Von Neumann cardinal assignment
>Von Neumann cellular automaton
>Von Neumann constant (two of them)
>Von Neumann interpretation
>Von Neumann measurement scheme
>Von Neumann Ordinals
>Von Neumann universal constructor
>Von Neumann entropy
>Von Neumann Equation
>Von Neumann neighborhood
>Von Neumann paradox
>Von Neumann regular ring
>Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory
>Von Neumann spectral theory
>Von Neumann universe
>Von Neumann conjecture
>Von Neumann's inequality
>Stone–von Neumann theorem
>Von Neumann's trace inequality
>Von Neumann stability analysis
>Quantum statistical mechanics
>Von Neumann extractor
>Von Neumann ergodic theorem
>Ultrastrong topology
>Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem
>ZND detonation model

Does all tensor analysis revolve around einstein notation? I have an hard time figuring out the equations with it. Is there anybody who uses different notations more in the likes of linear algebra?

>>8435084
>Does all tensor analysis revolve around einstein notation?

Yes. That's what tensor analysis is, index manipulation.