>go to the moon only once and never go back again in the past

File: 1398327926822.jpg (735KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1500x1000px

>he fell for the moon landing meme

The technology wasn't advanced enough back then that it would've been possible to go to the Moon. Also, in the original footage the American flag is clearly fluttering in wind, even though there is no wind on the Moon. It was all a hoax to win the space race without wasting too much money.

lol good thread :DDD

>>8431804
You think you can tell if the moon landing was a hoax but the KGB couldn't? Lol

>>8431804
>It was all a hoax to win the space race without wasting too much money.
So why were the Soviets less skeptical than tinfoil hats 40 years later?

>>8431804
>fluttering in wind
>implying there would be wind in the studio

>>8431837
Why build a desolate wasteland devoid of life in a studio when you have the state of Arizona?

>>8431837
Learn2underwaterinnasatrainingpool

>>8431815
>>8431816
If the KGB was so smart and skeptical, why did the USSR fall apart?
Christians:1
US muh moon landing gaylords: 0

>>8431852
why would they miss such an important detail?

>>8431652
> why build a colony on the moon when we can build one on Mars for 100 times the cost!
First off, don't worry about anyone wasting actual money trying to send people to Mars. Musk needs to hype his company, politicians need to look like they're doing something. Humans on Mars is this generation's fusion power: it will always be 50 years away.

Second: one valid reason for choosing Mars over the moon is that Mars has an atmosphere. Admittedly, it's not much of an atmosphere, but it stops your "colony" from being constantly bombarded by meteorites the size of rice grains. There's a reason the lunar surface appears to be covered in a foot-deep layer of talcum powder.

>Spending trillions on pipe dreams just for the ultimate white flight

Just admit your racists already

>>8431652
The moon is covered with glass-like particles called moon dust which can cause serious damage to equipment and humans. This pretty much makes a permanent moon settlement impossible

>>8431652
>go to the moon only once and never go back again in the past 50 years
Dumb frogposter. There have been multiple manned moon landings, however the last one was in 1972.

>>8431652
gravity is important for our biology?

>>8431652
You do know moon gets a lot of beating from space rocks right?
If you took that into consideration, I salute your determination being a literal pill cutter so that earth get its right dosage of space rocks.

>>8431652
The only thing the moon has going for it over mars is proximity. Going to mars is more about taking the next step as a species than it is about finding an affordable place to live, but sure lets just stay as 1 planet cucks.

>>8432973
I'd send an asian qt