is there any event which can occur in nature but whose mirror reflection can't?
>>8426817
If there are no mirrors, what is there to reflect?
>>8426818
hmm, really gets the brain waves propagating
Nature of mankind
>>8426817
How do mirrors work though?
>>8426817
Vampirism
>>8426847
Mirrors are -1/12 times more massive than a black hole. They bend spacetime in such a way that light is not only absorbed but even reflected.
>>8426817
black people at night time senpai
>>8426822
That's not an event
>>8426817
produce heat from a fire.
>>8426965
Kek
>>8426817
Thermal radiation. Normal glass used in mirrors absorb it.
/thread
>>8426965
SHEEEEET
>>8426817
>event which can occur in nature but whose mirror reflection can't
the only event in a mirror is light reflection basically amongst other irrelevant ones
>implying a natural event is reproduced in the reflected image in like some magical realm
LEARN ENLISH FAGGOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>8426951
lmao
>>8427935
yes but what i'm saying is there an event which you would say is impossible in the universe if you saw its mirror reflection? like some nuclear reaction with right handedness.
>>8426965
wow
+1 internetz for you sir
XD
>>8426817
neutrinos.
>>8426817
Anything involving electro-magnetism is un-mirrorable - no plane symmetry.
i.e. if current flows through wire from one side to another, it will deflect magnetic needle up-down. When current is inverted - so will be needle.
>>8426817
OPs mom is the correct answer.
>>8426822
LEL
>>8426817
Big moon.
>>8426817
Yes, all Weak force interactions are parity violating.
>>8426817
How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?
>>8431332
wow, 20 posts before one that's corect
>>8431332
Pairity is not a mirror image.
Pairity: x,y,z->-x,-y,-z
Mirror in xy plane: x,y,z->x,y,-z
>>8432030
your right, parity is a mirror image followed by a rotation, and since we already know rotations are symmetries of nature it is the same thing.
>>8426817
>is there any event which can occur in nature but whose mirror reflection can't?
pushing something through a hole in the mirror.
>>8433384
this would be very easy to capture in a mirror
>>8433408
>this would be very easy to capture in a mirror
Yes, but the observed result from the perspective of the mirror would be the thing disappearing, which it can't actually do.
Put a mirror on the floor and drop something on it. The dropped thing's reflection will be in accelerating motion upwards because of gravity.
Magnets. Pure sorcery.
>>8426817
why not both
>>8426817
What did he mean by this?
>>8434181
saved
>>8426817
can someone post the original image this was made from? Reverse image search isn't working and it's bothering me
>inb4 "this is the original image lel"