When will you stupid fucking brainlets realize that just because

>>8419292
doesn't even go on sci enough to troll

File: was he our Father.jpg (20KB, 199x304px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 199x304px

>>8419292

>>>/out/ism

everything about science from 1900 to 1950 was objectively better than what we have now

>all kind of technologies discovered
>all kinds of medical breakthroughs, antibiotics, surgery techniques, brilliant inventors who give their shit away for free like the polio vaccine and insulin
>people always trying to figure out new shit, the sky was the limit

now
>pharamcorp spent another 10 billion on another boner drug lol
>doesn't matter if some guy came up with a breakthrough equivalent to the guys who discovered polio vaccine and insulin because it costs literal billions to get through the FDA regulations nowdays
>nothing new except meme shit discovered like boner pills and liposuction
>way too much red tape
>a bunch of autists sitting around telling you that science is settled and we can't possibly know anything more than we currently know right now

>>8419355
Literally Idiocracy, hell we even have a reality TV star almost becoming president.

>>8419292
>When will you stupid fucking brainlets realize that just because you can't prove that something yet exists doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
Who ever said otherwise?

>You fucking brainlets in 1850 would be saying the same stupid shit.
>There's no way you can split the atom anon. You can't prove it. Atom splitting doesn't exist.
For any epistemological rule it's trivial to find a situation where it would lead to a false belief, what's your point? What are you even attacking?

>Okay brainlets. Just like atom splitting you are wrong about God and other metaphysical concepts existing.
No.

>>8419292
Which god/s?

Can you prove consciousness exists?

>>8419565
Prove deez nuts exist bitch.

>>8419292
>There's no way you can split the atom anon. You can't prove it. Atom splitting doesn't exist.

There are also piles and piles of theories throughout the ages that people once dearly believed to be true but turned out to be false. Something not having evidence for it doesn't mean it exists.

>>8419565
can you prove anything exists?

>>8419565
>>8419582
wtf I love solipsism now.