I finished high school and never properly learned science.
How to study math, physics, chemistry and biology from the basics, and build deeper insightful levels of knowledge on those fields?
Please help a brainlet.
>>8393744
khan academy
>>8393744
Read a textbook
Do problems
>>8393747
Are you talking serious or is just a meme?
I got Campbell book on biology, Paul G. Hewitt on Physics.
How can I know if I'm cut for research? I want to test myself to study science from the start and advance from there. Please guide me.
I'm dead real serious, please help.
>>8393754
Wich textbooks?
>>8393756
well khan academy is mostly for basic stuff it's a good as starting point so if that's not what you want then idk anon
>>8393768
It honestly depends on where you're at. Intro calc books like Stewart, high school physics books or intro physics like Tipler, intro to Lin alg etc
Check the wiki for a good list
>>8393744
>>8393832
Do you have more like this? thanks!!!
>>8393890
This chemistry book was the one I was searching for so long! I forgotten the name of it! Thank you very very much.
More books like this plz
>>8393832
>bible
why again?
>>8393890
http://4chan-science.wikia.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
Is this book any good?
>>8394106
We used that for my intro to proofs class, it's pretty good if you have no formal background to proof techniques. Also covers logic and the math is all very fundamental so that the real focus is just proof techniques.
A combination of senior high school or lower level Uni textbooks complemented with things like Khan Academy and For Dummies books are your best bet.
>>8393979
Bible: always right.
Science: always wrong.
>>8394123
Is there any core difference between this and "How to Solve It"?
>>8394106
yes it's good. now stop wasting time and start reading it.
>>8393744
>2016
if you are asking here, i have bad news for you...
>>8394147
How to Solve It is more of a how to approach math problems book than proofs.
If you want to learn to solve problems at a first year level then I suggest math tutor dvd series. If you just want to learn abstractions then idk the teaching company?
if you're into listening and watching rather than reading?
>>8393744
Becoming an autodidact in science is probably like the hardest shit ever. How will you know if you are wrong? Or if you fucked up on some tiny detail?
Not to say it's impossible, but it requires rigorous assessment of your own ability.
>>8393979
Trolling
>>8393979
Too many ignorant folks have never read it yet hold strong opinions on it.
You only need one book.
>>8393744
>>8394832
this desu