Holy shit when you think about we're all just water. Just

no we're not

>>8324102

yes

>>8324102
You're a sack of holy shit.

>>8324102
>Just walking, talking sacks of water.
>>8324150
>no we're not

We're walking, talking sacks of water so filthy that it would be illegal to dump it into natural waterways without first going through serious decontamination procedures.

File: 1412788386337.png (1MB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x1280px

>when you think about we're all just water.

Let [math]p = \text{"you think about"}[/math] and [math]q = \text{"we're all just water"}[/math]. You proposed [math]p \to q[/math].

What if [math]\lnot p[/math]? Could that possibly imply [math]\lnot q[/math]? I.e, if I don't "think about", then we are not "just water"?

>>8324102

If we're water, why don't we disolve in the sea?

Checkmate atheists.

>>8324234
our hardy skin-bags.

File: welp.png (188KB, 374x370px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 374x370px

>banan tastes pretty dry
>wonder how much water content it has
>probably just 23-030 percent
>look it up
>mfw it's 70-80 percent

>>8324233
Nice demonstration, I just don't understand why you used the binomial for this.

>>8324102
>just
No
I can put water in a sack but it won't act like a human. Things are not their component parts.

>>8324102
really makes you think