Black holes have infinite mass and density yet scientists tell

Most information about black holes is hypothesized since we lack theories dealing with quantum gravity.
Also, the event horizon is growing. The singularity is the middle has in fact infinity infinite mass and density.

>>8311504
>Black holes have infinite mass
And theres your mistake

>>8311741
This.

d= m/v

Black holes have finite mass, 0 volume, infinite density.

According to our current understanding they're a divide by zero error in spacetime.

More information is needed to explain how/why/what.

File: Star Wars Mickey.jpg (7KB, 255x198px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 255x198px

>>8311504
>Black holes have infinite mass and density
[citation needed]

>>8311735
>The singularity is the middle has in fact infinity infinite mass and density.
[citation needed]

>>8311757
>0 volume, infinite density
[citation needed]

Not even close people

>>8312075
I'm glad there are people like you to keep the autism in check, based anon

Pop Science Lied To You: The Thread

File: Sag A 1995-2014.png (247KB, 572x572px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 572x572px

>>8311504, >>8311735, >>8311757

>>8312075 (me)
Let's take Sagittarius A*, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way.

The Approximate Superlative Data:
Distance: 26 K ly
Mass: 4 M solar masses
Diameter: 44 M km

>pic: Orbits of prominent stars around Sag A*
>1995-2014
>A. Ghez, Keck, UCLA

>>8312111
Thank you

>>8312155
But that may not be a blackhole, perhaps it is some new unknown stellar object. We have yet to image the event horizon.

File: Humans.jpg (23KB, 320x279px)

23KB, 320x279px

>>8312189
>But that may not be a blackhole
[citation needed]

>>8311757
>divide by zero
This is not possible.

>>8312211
>>8312211
prove it's a blackhole then. Where's a picture of the event horizon?

>>8311504
>implying there is only one size of infinity

>>8312465
Are you literally retarded

friendly reminder that we know jackshit about black holes and most of what you've heard is conjecture and bullshit

>physics
>>>/x/

>there are people who think Sag A* isn't a black hole
I didn't know people could be in denial about this

>>8312664
It compares favorably to literal flat earthers

>>8312075
>At the center of a black hole, as described by general relativity, lies a gravitational singularity, a region where the spacetime curvature becomes infinite.[61] For a non-rotating black hole, this region takes the shape of a single point and for a rotating black hole, it is smeared out to form a ring singularity that lies in the plane of rotation.[62] In both cases, the singular region has zero volume. It can also be shown that the singular region contains all the mass of the black hole solution.[63] The singular region can thus be thought of as having infinite density.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole#cite_ref-65

>>8312699
>>8311757
>>8312075

Here's your citation.

Infinite mass, 0 volume.

The infinity mass and infinity density thing is from the general relativity but it can't describe what's happening beyond the horizon since it also need quantum thing, so we need quantum gravity to describe this shit