What's wrong with String Theory?
Isn't it just another model that can make predictions, describe phenomena, and be parsimonious at the same time?
>>8311079
>make predictions
lol
>>8311079
should i study physics or mathematics????!!!
>>8311079
unprovable. Although I don't know that much about it but it does seem like it is just conjecture
>>8311090
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory#Applications_to_quantum_field_theory
https://www.amazon.com/Not-Even-Wrong-Failure-Physical/dp/0465092764
>>8311096
unprovable or unfalsifiable?
>>8311093
Mathematical-finance/economy
>>8311105
no fuck u
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnWjZCS9YVY
>physics
>>>/x/
>>8311079
the lack of predictions is not a problem of string theory, it is a problem of quantum gravity, and string theory is the only known theory for quantum gravity. Blame the planck scale, not the theory!
>>8311217
> string theory is the only known theory for quantum gravity
You're an idiot.
Look into
- Loop quantum gravity
- Euclidean quantum gravity
- Group field theory
- Hořava–Lifshitz gravity
- Superfluid vacuum theory
- Canonical quantum gravity
- Twistor theory
And many others.
>>8311236
none of them is a theory of quantum gravity, actually. Because they have the word "quantum" and "gravity" together, doesn't mean shit.
No UV nor IR completition. No renormalization schem. No s-matrix computations. They are just nothing. And, even worse, none of them can predict black hole entropy. Why do you even call them theories os quantum gravity?
>>8311079
>What's wrong with String Theory?
Nothing
>>8311104
probably unfalsifiable
>>8311079
>What's wrong with String Theory?
It uses circular reasoning.
It uses itself to to prove itself.
>string theory
>make predictions
hahaha
>describe phenomena
topest of keks
>parsimonious
my sides are resonating in a 6-dimensional Calabi–Yau manifold
Until string theory can calculate cross sections for known particle interactions, it's not the theory it claims to be.
>>8311079
zero evidence