How did this go from being about quantum physics and abiogenesis

wat

>>8307604
not op but found the commercial I saw a few weeks ago. It's pretty much sjw schlock

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6zktzk17hE

>>8307628
Before I'm branded a numale SJW jew marxist, may I ask why it was "sjw schlock"? I couldn't hear all of it because the sound was shit quality, but from what I discerned, the trailer was all about asking the questions, they didn't state anything outright. Since when is asking questions SJW?

>>8307640

The show is supposed to be about science and space, not fucking sociology and dinduology

>>8307628
>morgans face

even he knows

>>8307640
>even the most normal person can become a violent extremist
>sex determination balances on the head of a pin
>the trigger may also be pulling your finger

delet

>>8307651
Wrong, it's clearly about popsci, which is closer to sociology than science.

>>8307628
>Is gun crime a virus?

I can hardly believe this is real

Those are normal scientific questions.
The fact they trigger the 4chan crowd isn't scientifically relevant.

>>8308298

>>>/rddt/

>implying this show ever accurately discussed quantum physics

File: tmp_16990-smRed7Ml-556155988.jpg (35KB, 640x505px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 640x505px

>>8308298
>What makes a terrorist?
>Are there more than two sexes?
>Is gun crime a virus?

>>>>>Those are normal scientific questions.

Nah, if they're good they might use science to explore the topic, but they're meant to be political.

>>8307603
> Controversy attracts viewers.
> Politics are controversial.
> The science channel is in the money making business, not the educational business.

>>8307603
trannies and niggers bring viewers. viewers=money

also, "viewers" is a superset. trannies and niggers are subsets of viewers. tmyk