I just had what I imagine isnt a new one. But bear with me.

You would need a particle accelerator, a way to generate protons, and a target like beryllium. Also, neutrinos are weakly interacting, so chances are you couldn't use them for anything.

>>8306434
Whats the math about having a neutrino bounce back into a sensor?

Im talking lots of neutrinos here, I dont thin kyou understand.

>>8306439

Disillusioned individual take a step back; what are you using scientific theory for?

>>8306453
>8306453
I want to see the world at very tiny distances.

Make sense to use very tiny particles to do so.

>>8306465

Seriously consider whether you're able to put in the time and effort to study the science and math to deepen understand in the things you want to know, otherwise, you're dreaming and not using your time effectively.

>>8306439
My friend, we're talking about particles that million dollar detectors have trouble detecting.

>>8306470
Can a plasma field be used to block interfering cosmic radiation?

>>8306547
Sure, why not?

>>8306559
WE need more power

>>8306547
cosmic radiation is just photons and plasma, So adding more plasma wouldn't really do much. You're better off using something solid like lead

I could count the amount of brain cells OP has on one hand

>>8306569
More the better, no?