endnote is a piece of fucking shit, waste of space, worst software

good luck typing all your 3 digit references. if you don't have that much then your work is trivial and you're a fucking pleb

>>8296250
What exactly is your problem with it? I've used everything pretty much, menderly, zotero, jabref, read cube, docear, and endnote ofc. Jabref is my favourite but had to switch to endnote for word (university wants thesis written in word)

Mendeley + bibtex ftw

>>8296332
>word

That's gross, I hope you're not in a STEM field.

>>8296292
this

>>8296292

i have extensive referencing.

i feel like typing it out helps me remember the authors of crucial papers.

>>8296459

>good enough for professors who are at the absolute top of my field
>good enough for me

>>8296332

formatting, failure to export references uniformly

just seems like a fucking redundant thing.

All of them are shit actually.

>>8296638
>Word
>Being good enough for scientific papers
There is a reason why a lot of journals won't even accept word documents.

>>8296659

my faculty receives the highest citations (impact factor) and highest output of quality research papers in my field worldwide

>you are probably citing our papers
>jog on cunt

>>8296659
For biology, Word is standard.