Do you want the universe to restart in a big crunch or slowly fade into nothingness (heat death)?
The latter sounds quite comfy to be quite desu.
>>8294281
Couldn't a big crunch just result in the universe being exactly the same so everything you do is repeated forever
>>8294317
The chances approach zero.
>>8294324
But why would the conditions be different a second time
>>8294333
Why wouldn't they?
>>8294281
A big crunch would be pretty cool to witness.
It would be quite romantic watching the universe seemingly fall on you and there is nothing you can do about it.
>>8294356
why would they?
>>8294317
since this universe happened the chances of it happening again are above 0%
>>8294364
You can always travel to a black hole
>>8294281
I rather find a way to stop entropy continuing the universe for eternity and existing comfortably doing whatever I want in whatever entertainment we got.
Or create my own universe.
>>8294397
Yeah, but doing that voluntarily is just suicide.
>>8294366
If you would know exactly what happens in the point of space and time compressed in a size smaller than an atom, if you would make one like that and study it.
Then know what happen in hours and you could predict the structure after the crunch you could say it'll be exactly the same or different.
Big crunch, because if that's how the universe ends, that means that it started that way this time, which gives rise to more questions.
Heat death seems really unlikely and kind of boring desu
>>8294480
Given the rate of expansion and the constant of dark matter - big crunch is not possible.
Instead of string theory is right a big rip would be possible.
Otherwise heat death it's the solution to the problem.