There's nothing in quantum physics that can't be easily

post more kirino

File: 1454717516893.gif (3MB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 512x288px

>>8292968

File: 1454717547844.png (178KB, 535x466px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 535x466px

>>8292968
...

>>8292962
MAKE DETERMINISM GREAT AGAIN!

>>8292962
spectral emission and absorption lines, go

If you are using Bohmian mechanics, why invoke different bullshit to explain phenomena Bohmian mechanics is already capable of explaining?

>>8292985
What's anti-logical about those?

>>8292987
I misunderstood you, thought you meant explain quantum with classical mechanics

>>8292962
Explain how pilot waves explain QM. Explain how worm holes solve entanglement (Bonus: define a worm hole). I expect rigorous derivations and experimental proof supporting your claims.

>>8292986
>In Bohmian mechanics, the entire universe is governed a wave equation incorporating the entire history of the universe and all the particles in it. So, there's no entanglement -- the detectors are governed by the same equations so the correlation can never be removed by experimental configuration.

Because that's awful

>>8292991
They are 'interpretations' of QM, not models to replace QM. These interpretations fit the QM formulas just fine.

>>8292962
>pilot wave

But even the uncollapsed portion of the wave function still exists in Bohmian mechanics. Not to mention it isn't even Lorentz invariant

>worm-hole

No.

>>8292997
Lorents effect is just gravity

>>8293001
lol

>>8293001
this

>>8293003
The reason pilot-wave produces the same results as Lorentz QM despite not being Lorentz invariant is that gravity at quantum scales is negligible

>>8292992
>I don't like the consequences of the phenomena I invoked to remove spooky quantum behavior

Then why did you invoke it at all?

>>8293014
pilot-wave =/= the entire package of Brohmian theory

>>8293009
Unless you want to also describe collider experiments, this works

[gravity also isn't always negligible in quantum stuff; look up the effects of gravity on cold-atom laser traps]

>>8293009
It's still not Lorentz invariant. Bohm himself conceded that his interpretation could never be Lorentz invariant. If it were true, it would require reintroducing the concept of absolute simultaneity

>>8293023
>muh Bohm is the only possible way to do pilot-wave

pilot-waves have been observed, the formulas are secondary

>>8293016
Given that Bohmian mechanics is the generalization of pilot-waves into a real theory and not just a specialized toy model, it really does.

>>8293041
Bouncing oil droplets are not deBrooglie pilot-waves unless you invoke formal equivalence through all those messy formulas you don't like.

>>8293053
The only people to bring up Bohm and deBrooglie are the deniers