How does infalling EM radiation affect a black hole? Black hole

>>8288118
Gamma radiation falls into black hole #2, increasing its mass ever so slightly.

No. The black hole in the universe with radiation would be more massive. It would have captured photons and grown while the solitary black hole would lose mass to Hawking radiation.

>>8288118
Black holes, according to their current formulation in general relativity, have exactly three properties: mass, angular momentum (how fast they're spinning), and electrical charge. They have no other discernible properties, according to the No-Hair Theorem.

So under current models of black holes, the latter would be exactly the same in all but one aspect, with the only difference being a higher mass from the additional photons absorbed.

Can a black hole absorb its own Hawking radiation?

>>8288211

Can a man suck his own dick?

>>8288219
This is trivial. Of course a man can do that.

What does it tell about the equivalence of everything that EM radiation itself can theoretically collapse into a black hole given a high enough energy density?

File: 1426359816623.jpg (70KB, 600x534px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 600x534px

>>8288222
them trips

>>8288222
>The proof has been left as an exercise for the reader

>>8289011
A necessary but not sufficient condition.

>>8288118
>a black hole
Wrong board? please use >>>/x/

>>8289141
Why do you spend even seconds of your life writing these posts? What kind of philosophy is behind your shitposting?

>>8289153
Just want /x/shit to stay in /x/. This is /sci/, so go back to your voodoo witchcract friends on >>>/x/

>>8289165
No, you're just shitposting, please accept it.

>>8289670
says the one who supports /x/ bullshit on /sci/ and bait threads