Ok, what if they actually went through and detonated a 10gt bomb

That would be pretty cool I guess

It'd be pretty cool if it was detonated at the bottom of the Kola Borehole

>>8281873
I don't think we could create a yield that high with current technology. Best we have is two stage lithium fusion.

>>8283573
That hole is not wide enough for that

>>8283902
maybe they could detonate it in ur mum lmoa

10gt of what bomb?

>>8283581
Lithium fusion?
Deuterium + Lithium = profit?

>>8283905
love this post

>>8283581
>[CURRENT YEAR]
>[CURRENT TECHNOLOGY}

Stop this meme. It's a piece of cake to create arbitrarily many stages, but we don't even need to do this.

>could be possible lol
You know char bomba could get to 100 MT just by changing the tamper, right?
1 GT is just an order of magnitude larger, you could even scale the fucking design linearly and expect it to work.

literally no one answered ops question

File: three stage nuke.jpg (113KB, 854x500px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 854x500px

>>8283581
We have had three stage fusion since the fifties. The Tsar bomba was a three stage nuke. The US B41 was a three stage nuke with 5 Mt/ton energy to weight ratio. Old Teller himself wanted to build a gigaton class nuclear weapon back in the 90's with collaboration with the ruskies so that we could assfuck asteroids.

File: 456455643.png (112KB, 724x905px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 724x905px

>>8281873
The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake released 9,560 gigatons TNT equivalent.

>>8283905
Never change, /sci/.