Do you think there are any health risks connected to not being

English nigger

>>8281341
>Do you think there are any health risks connected to not being grounded in daily life? Grounded as in getting the stores electricity out of your body.
I'm pretty sure that does nothing.

>First was perfume which I can understand since it's chemicals that we're not used to and can cause allergies.
Depends on the perfume.

>Next was the danger of wi-fi which I can see may be dangerous with overexposure, but the power levels are not ionizing so it's a grey zone.
There's not clear evidence linking low-power non-ionizing radiation to any health effects.

>But this one with grounding and stores electricity that might hurt our health is beyond me.
Your mom is into silly shit. Other than mentioning that this stuff isn't harmful, there's really not much you can do but ignore it.

File: 7529988_orig[1].jpg (90KB, 768x487px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 768x487px

>>8281341
Talk numbers dickbreath. Constant exposure have cumulative effects.

>>8281727
>Maximum absorption of >3W/kg
Yeah, how terrifying. The lights on your ceiling probably deliver more than that. Daylight definitely does.

>Constant exposure have cumulative effects.
Not always, no.

File: radiation-doses[1].jpg (1003KB, 1020x783px) Image search: [Google]

1003KB, 1020x783px

>>8281762
>constant exposure doesn't always have cumulative effects
The most retarded post I've seen in a year. Read the statement above the chart, if they thought you how to read.

>>8281779
>The most retarded post I've seen in a year. Read the statement above the chart, if they thought you how to read.
>Ionizing radiation dose
Uh..?
Wi-fi isn't ionizing radiation.

File: blue-spongeka.gif (358KB, 500x623px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 500x623px

>mfw anon thinks constant exposure to water eventually lets you breathe underwater

>>8281779
Where's the rest of the chart you dumb shit

>>8281779
normal yearly background dose is like 6 mSv if you're in the USA

File: MQ9M4ob.png (751KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 800x600px

>>8281341
>Grounded as in getting the stores electricity out of your body.
That's not how electricity works.

>neo hippie lady and she comes up with different modern day stuff that may or may not hurt our health.
She's pulling bullshit out of her ass and if she's ever right it's a pure coincidence.
Your "mum" fights for the forces of darkness and should be ignored or (better yet) ridiculed so she stops holding humanity back.
Call her a silly cunt for me.

>>8281811
kek

>tfw physic teacher beleaves wifi is dangerous
>annon i bought 2 cress plants and had one >near the router and it died faster

she probably had her rooter in the last corner of the room

If an electromagnetic wave doesnt have the energy to break bonds or excite water molecules, how can it be dangerous?

>>8282656
>If an electromagnetic wave doesnt have the energy to break bonds or excite water molecules, how can it be dangerous?
Cyber-bullying?