Me and the whole class ended up in a situation where we had to

>>8270227
>What does it mean?

That your dumb. Your intellectually superior classmates found a way using only natural numbers while your pleb brain needed the fucking rationals to answer properly.

Your IQ is probably 10 points below your classmates. At least.

File: 1454717808790.jpg (8KB, 265x265px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 265x265px

>>8270236
>0
>natural

>>8270236
This
OP's only hope is to get into CS

>>8270227
you are probably influenced by programming, where sometimes 0 can be a pain in the ass?

>>8270227
2/3+2/9+2/27+.....

>>8270227
It mean you try too hard to feel special.
You aren't special.

>>8270247
How do you know that? Maybe I am.

1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 + ...
not special snowflake enough famalam

>>8270251
you're right, nobody else can be this retarded.

0.999... + ?

>>8270227
You're all dumb, the answer is 1/2+1/2

>>8270237
Most constructions of the naturals assume that 0 is the first number and not 1.

I mean, without 0 you have no additive identity and that really fucks up when trying to do algebra with the naturals.

>>8270358
0.999... + 0

1+2+3+.... + 13/12

>>8270387
Kek

>>8270387
10/10

>>8270365
OP here, that was my first option

but I didn't like that they were the same number

10/3*3/10=0.99999...=1

>>8270320
but this doesnt sum to 1

>>8270227
Fucking scrub

[eqn]\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{1}{n}[/eqn]

>>8270476
Don't post on this board again please.

File: 1463861227828.png (117KB, 238x351px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 238x351px

>>8270387

>>8270505
You know that that sum diverges right?

>>8270505
High tier bait

>>8270527
Retarded

>>8270532
>Retarded

It diverges man. I am not even joking. Look it up, it is quite interesting.

>>8270227
It means that ur a special snowflake OP

>>8270227
7 and 3 are spiritually significant

>>8270227
surprised nobody did 1 = 1

>>8271604
Congrats, you are actually dumber than OP.

>>8271604
>invent a sum
I mean, I'm not quite sure what OP was supposed to do either, but that's not it.

>>8270505
Did you mean this?
[math]\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{x-1}{x^n}[/math]

>>8271654
>i is the subject of the sum
>i is not even a term of the expression

Something doesn't quite ADD UP.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>8270320
Mate
2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 + 2 - 2 .........

de-ja vu

Hol' up, guys, I think everyone's ignoring the
>invent
part. This has to be a sum that no one has ever seen before to count; your fancy geometric series won't cut it. I propose:
0.265162962559105821 +
0.462153212528622563 +
-0.132136235632693500 +
0.404820060544965116

Let me know if that looks familiar to anyone.

>>8272012
It reminds me of the hunt.

>>8270237
Enjoy your pointless set [math]\mathbb{W}[/math], stupid American. xD

>>8270237
Nigger, not having 0 in the naturals makes no fucking sense. That's why we have Z+, fucker.

I hate people like you, making things inconsistent for no goddamn reason. Kill yourself!

>>8271648
It's a sum of one number retard

>>8272012
Nope I did that one before