So what are objectively the hardest and most rigorous engineering

File: 1471063693485.png (93KB, 681x1716px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 681x1716px

>>8270207

File: a92d764426197de4d72cd129a762fcd83346e4cf89ed7b0e57f796693c682ff72c784bdc0e0c1939a9480f0595984807f9d1b5ca312fc1b298b57388fc22ecea.png (29KB, 1072x946px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1072x946px

>>8270207

>>8270208
Objective

>>8270210
Biased list that shows the author's butthurt

>>8270207
Why would Civil be at the bottom?

Because Arquitecture is shit it doesn't mean CivilE is.

Are computer and electrical similar in difficulty? or is computer engineering somewhere between comp sci and electrical engineering?

>>8270208
if >700 you can post on /sci/
if <730 you will be made fun of on /sci/

>>8270208
>judging engineers on how well they know pre-calculus

kek

>>8270214
I think its fair to say it has the best of both worlds.

>>8270217
SAT is known to correlate with IQ 1:1

>>8270213
That seems to be the consensus, I dont know. Even though everything on here seems to be a dick measuring contest and constant competition on who's major is fucking better. Any engineering degree is a ticket to the upper class american dream. Plus any engineering degree is better then what 97% of what people ever do with their lives

>>8270217
>implying the average engineer does any math on a level higher than pre-calculus
Computers do all of our calculus and DEs, fa.m

>>8270224
Even with a technologist degree you are better than 80% of the people for sure, job guaranteed if you are not an autist.

>>8270219
>IQ
>being anything more than a retard test

>>8270219
is this sarcasm? I'm actually genuinely interested if it is or not