So I was thinking, in order to increase land mass and/or decrease

>>8264241
They're called hills

>>8264241
So houses would have tilted floors? Great idea.

>>8264247
Yup. Nobody has ever built a house on tilted ground and made it horisontal.

File: 53573.png (6KB, 858x487px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 858x487px

>>8264416
And that somehow wouldn't defeat the point of building on tilted land to get more land area.

>>8264423
Ohh sorry didn't notice all land was occupied with houses. Wall to wall. No roads or anything.

>some idiot falls asleep with a lit cigarette
>his curtains catch fire
>he happens to live at the bottom of the hill
>entire civilization destroyed

>house at top of hill falls over
>landslide
>entire civilization destroyed

>couldn't we just
>we

You fucking dolt how the fuck would you tilt a land mass you fat fuck

>>8264241
how the hell do you propose to tilt an entire landmass?

>>8264426
So you want to increase the length of roads without increasing usable land... Wow, yet another OP who is totally not a faggot.

>>8264426
You really aren't very bright, are you?

>>8264430
sounds a bit hyperbolic to me anon

>>8264430
A zig zag pattern would also work.

>>8264241
I think what you're looking for is something called a building. It optimizes surface area by stacking floors on top of the same area.

File: Palin Sarah Law God.jpg (11KB, 312x162px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 312x162px

>>8264241
It's called a hill (or mountain)
We have trouble with them from time to time.
Please note the lack of arable land in much of Appalachia in the US.
Check out their construction techniques and their 30-45 degree driveways.
Clear cut the forest and level the mountains. That would provide more land for housing and agriculture and you wouldn't have those silly driveways in the holler (hollow for you folks that don't live there)

You're just silly
Also see >>8264968/this

>>8264241
Population density is based on photosynthesis to crop uptake of solar photons, dipshit.

>>8265140
And all this time I thought it was the relative number of people per unit area squared