Are atoms alive? Are they conscious? How does our own consciousness

>>8232449
>Are atoms alive? Are they conscious?
No

>How does our own consciousness come out of an amalgamation of atoms?
Unrelated magic

>>8232449
No.
No.
Dunno.

>>8232449
where is gorilla?

>>8232449
What is the evolutionary advantage of atoms?

why do the atoms that form a fox want to eat the atoms that form a chicken?

>>8232470
Laws of physics

If Daniela Titan puts two atoms in a box and at least one of them decays in a half-life, what is the probability both atoms decayed?

>>8232483
Where does the intelligence come from? The laws of physics that work on the atoms?

They have consciousness in the quantum field.
They are so special!

>>8232449
Lots of atoms make a liquid, yet no single one is.

>>8232449
Yes, yes, and atoms therefore atoms.

>>8232487
1/3

>>8233828
so 1/3 = half life

so you have that 0 = half life 3

half life 3 does not exist and never will, Q.E.D.

>>8232449
sure.
sure.
sure
I mean individual atoms are affected gravitationally and electromagnetically by other
atoms. So If you want to call the ability of something to be affected by something else ie; a bunch of atoms affected by a bunch of other atoms which affects other atoms... 'consciousness' then I guess you could say that atoms are conscious.

>>8232449
Atoms are alive and they have feelings.

Atoms are conscious, that's what string theory tells us that consciousness is quantized qualia extending the traditonal 3 spatial + 1 temporal dimensions to 3 spatial + 1 temporal + 9 qualia = 13 dimensions.

Consciousness is brain waves; simply put qualia particles are related to them by a simple Susskind Transform, a variant of the Fourier Transform for extending Heisenberg's famous duality to unbounded self-adjoint operators over the non-Abelian Gell-Mann gauge fields with a torsionless affine connection in the Feynman-Mills field. Basic 3rd order perturbation theory of quantum field theory is all you need to show this for flat spaces. Just as a remark, the extension to general relativity is proportional to the stress tensor of the EM field which is why we are still having trouble unifying general relativity with QFT.

If particles didn't have consciousness, most of string theory breaks down because there's no way for them to observe particles and Everett's interpretation results in what is known as ergodic semi-destruction where the many worlds cause the cosmological constant to be exponential and all free will to be destroyed in the same way a black hole forms a singularity. The mathematics is entirely identical here, except instead of time you use a conserved 3-qualia vector of quaternions to derive the result. You can read more about it, since the rammifications of this are Conway's free will theorem.

>>8233906
I'm sorry, but without the professional input of Professor Jacob Barnett Ph.D M.D. Ed.D PHP BDSM I can't possibly trust anything you've written here.