Are nanobots a possible thing that can happen or should we just call them cells at that point?
pls respond
>>8192854
Are you asking if people should call nanobots "cells" when they do not meet any of the structural criteria for actual being a "cell"?
>>8193049
Look at the nanobot concept in your picture, does that look like a cell to you?
They have already used them on dogs with tons of success, and they are planning on testing them on a woman this year.
>>8193357
Do you think they will test it on a real human being soon after that?
>>8192854
Nanobots are so last decade. It's all about the picobots.
Bump
Anybody working on almost drexlerian stuff?
>>8195653
Bumping as well, very interested in this. Drexler is a god.
>>8193544
plankbots