The age of customized synthetic porn is upon us http://arxi

File: 1464707433855.png (451KB, 1907x2074px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1907x2074px

Might want to take a look at this. I'm not telling you how to live your life, but be aware of the consequences my friend.

>>8150212
classic memeposter

>>8150202
Stuff like this and the bedroom thing strike me as just being heavily overfitted. Have they really gone through every image the system was trained on to make sure it's not just spewing out things it has seen?

I'm not convinced.

>>8150495
i'm pretty sure it's not overfitted, it would be silly to publish if it was. Here is a similar paper (different method, similar idea) where they check for overfitting (see image on last page):
http://www.evolvingai.org/files/nguyen2016synthesizing.pdf

Somebody in another thread was talking about making taylor swift nudes with this, would that even be possible? Is unsupervised learning needed for that to work?

>>8150212
>depending on a female to satisfy your sexual needs
Can't wait for sexbots.

>>8150202
I don't see any boobs in there so I don't know what you're even talking about

>>8151450
The net can be trained with any set of images

>>8151465
You can get crappy shooped images at best. They can't produce a movie or anything

>>8151468
It's only a matter of time now. The idea is that the images will be good enough to fool a human, since they can fool a neural net built only to classify images.

>>8150202
The first thing I thought of when I saw image-manipulating networks was a program to automatically uncensor lewds.

>>8151469
Doubt it. I think you're exaggerating the potential of neural networks.

File: greenmanmaymay.jpg (110KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x800px

>>8151476
Well, only time will tell.

>yfw this is the first step in the genocide bingo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kDPxbS6ofw