Thread replies: 31
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6
File: article-2142570-1307347A000005DC-734_634x355.jpg (23KB, 634x355px) Image search:
[Google]
23KB, 634x355px
Anybody remember this picture from 2012?
This dude discovered it from NASA's photos: https://www.youtube.com/user/rob19791/videos?sort=p&view=0&flow=grid
It was all around the news worldwide. NASA quickly removed this picture after that and covered it up and confused people by showing another picture. This got completly forgotten, it vanished from the web and I think the fact that NASA quickly removed it shows that this could be our first picture from a real ufo. (It's said that it is about the size of Jupiter)
>>
cool
>>
DUDE ALIENS LMAO
>>
You seem to mistake /sci/ with /x/
>>
>>8143621
Its nothing paranormal
>>
>>8143629
no it's not. It's just a lens flare. Now move on.
>>
File: lensflare.jpg (15KB, 800x450px) Image search:
[Google]
15KB, 800x450px
>>814363
This above looks nothing like a lens flare idiot
>>
File: 1442378427274.jpg (40KB, 425x384px) Image search:
[Google]
40KB, 425x384px
>>8143612
>It's said that it is about the size of Jupiter)
>>
>>8143643
Whats so funny about that?
>>
>>8143632
t. NASA
OP have you got any more information on the picture? I'm interested.
>>
>>8143674
look up the youtube channel i linked
>>
>>8143676
So any anomalous thing that is seen in outer space instead of investigating it we just laugh and ignore? 10/10 science. It's probably not aliens but UFOs are interesting in their own right
>>
>>8143674
https://www.google.de/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuqQVJMHUQunXK6ZbzD4q1Qxyfg6J-eUJpUPWWfULDFPGNtWxqAgc7oRnZjlMJ0Mw0H1CFMF0xmWj2y9_1q991dPPfIrtdXlMOpyc2OH23WA4MngR9O8nMjeiyOKm36JuU24sVvSqeNa1ZmWg9Lx5y_17Ko1EGWyNZiZGXhG0AIZzn-spd2134Aeh2Jt_1-GLXZ3FnbRa-kt7ZH1CarNXXdpijyFzdY6w3ENUtuovU8KJxe3EaZE1MX44ZiZAa09QYl4pEl4wtd8h0Zic9jprxs0AX-fZT0qFG0VLrF4oMCfwxhNNBNqbnfcgNdQIoDEybnGo6QFNGyMW8F9vrqV615qHH0R8fQ1moYmlabGvQG_1bllSZiKr1zGPE6vX2tNP4lUlNsj-2sLkD7-arWXJkszyNvaOarLJHbPvAxkQVH0o7sKK0CEO1R-L00o90bRiGUJvdiYQZksWY6s4m4ufA08qT1wwaj39Pa5JEZ3pUzl5ztnHtvzyo_1O7ndNSBs-2L8WQTDUNc8YSgcj1Ii2LIGQVz1uBD_18sTQ2e1n2nlDK6x1ozfFOS7pEgDHcx6ouoBfO-TSw2Ltgg8i4GXldBEzalRXTO3jSbBDxaUVTooF-362JI2hAE872FMy--b5Us-AT2bVarkRr9AbH7q-BPYyYDnO2hskVNCH8rpcf3Rgm5ThCHFeBnI4_1ksTMtUgqBXmYSWqEQrGMuilu2V6n3ZQbo0aEX1OvPzp8i4fh144DLp3xk9ATS6hdOXfV5Mv2P0tkDqflJVJUVzmzQiT8ePoHq5QlOCuHPYkV5Jb-x7GYQXORGwWH7WCkLcPCbPfnMzJ5ysTeyR_1LeC4si2o5FmV9NxlKONiaevY8nTMm1oJWTRt87SvypZlvWeWgIHx4I_1tO-KoMUMqOYOCnkn74ZttX2H-_1r8uiVyhqXtxFcWhQAuAz8K3yda4D5aZXR4seTVTBmB_1cAmZpcUnJ0-wljJ-IyNGK65NfyA4vHqqVjxgS9TzF9H6Q6IkaMN-S6tLqNdsc_1Bu0eZbjdu6iFUBgaK--lWiQo4B5xS6cHYCnpjNPxDs8Tcrt2uTJvUQEG4pziMH3h4aP4Xobg3PsP1R5gNjHmCMjiCRM7IartP5XiwzZbJOfJDXZiZudyPJD-DQ1y-M3q-EFQvjBvvxzTOvzTXzctcP0jGax5IXyonTegUyZnBh8OArhH78qE8RzqxZg6G0IQ_1WE7vBXrXVSUDzQpTTW6juiZpBGCuJTyFxAOuYlOTg0SfSZs0zRyY3FxG5tM-7_1kBVVilZmsxZ3jyb8LZDyt7Bn0NJJrrEjkM1p59BxwGguZcWyFYRI6M5W2dUaxSAvulUgvrjUTzyd1-rGaw7Lah_14W6KyQ
>>
>>8143716
I wanted something more official because YT is full of kooks but okay
>>
>>8143716
Interested guy here again. Going over it in slow mo I think that he added it. It just fades in like a computer animation. Unless I see proof that it was in the original this is a fake in my books.
A good tip from from a fellow UFO hunter: Don't bother with youtube. It's all fake shit from people looking for views. I only entertain the videos shot in the 1950s and 60s because videos where much harder to fake back then and if it was it's not hard to check for film tampering.
>>
File: 20160314_c2_c3_512.jpg (44KB, 1024x512px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 1024x512px
NASA shocked and mum.
Explain this away, UFO denialistists.
It's still in the SOHO archive.
>>
>>8143612
>NASA quickly removed this picture after that and covered it up and confused people by showing another picture.
Why do they always do this?
>>
>>8143724
nice link you fucking faggot
also:
>de
color me surprised
>>
>>8143843
>videos shot in the 1950s and 60s
I've never seen one, do they exist?
At that time it was usually film.
pic src www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case357.htm
"So they told one untruth, they had to tell another to cover that one, then another, then another.. it just snowballed."
>>
>>
>>8143988
> ufoevidence.com
seems unbiased :)
>>
Remember kids, anything can be a conspiracy or cover-up, as long as you are paranoid enough
>>
File: Brookings-House.jpg (59KB, 429x718px) Image search:
[Google]
59KB, 429x718px
>>8144032
>paranoid
yup, you can smell the fear
>>
If you were an alien race that wanted to study the early stage civilization humanity is here on earth would you contact the UN first to ask for permission or just use distant sensing and nanobots to never get discovered?
>>
It's a cosmic ray. Particle strikes the CCD and makes a streak or an set of streaks. The image has not been deleted. If you look at the image just before and just after you will see it is gone, replaced by many other different cosmic rays.
Please take your lies to /x/.
>>
>>8143919
Then OP is full of shit then. Check the image before and after. It is an artefact.
>>
>>8143649
We can see Jupiter with our bare eyes. Did we just miraculously not see this thing, too?
>>
>>8143929
To avoid being bogged down by inane shit.
>>
>>8144136
I want to believe that we're being watched by an autistic slob of a cosmic park ranger in some backwater part of the galaxy that nobody visits.
>>
>>8143988
Yeah. I posted a few on here but they got ignored or laughed at as usual. Google "Mariana UFO" and "Trementon Film"
>www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case357.htm
I know this case. If you read abotu the two films that I posted you will see that in all three cases the exact same thing happened; the USAF confiscated all or part of the footage. Lucky for us in those two movies they only alledgedly cut a few frames out unlike Cooper's film which has completely disappeared.
>>8144010
Yet skeptics will post their "evidence" from RationalWiki.
Thread posts: 31
Thread images: 6
Thread images: 6