1) Are economics and anthropology the hardest or "most legitimate"

>>8122111
it is not about how hard they are, its about how useful they are, modern economics its game ruled by jews an modern civilizations can grow up without anthropology.

>>8122119
0/10

OP here, related article: The Verdict Is in: Sociology and Political Science Deserve the Hatchet

http://freakonomics.com/2012/07/12/the-verdict-is-in-sociology-and-political-science-deserve-the-hatchet/

I really dont get why psychology gets all the burn. Its a really important and useful topic, regardless of how hard or easy it is, and in fact many ordinary people benefit widely from having a psychiatrist ...

>>8122195
Okay psych maybe isn't bad but it's certainly soft.

>>8122211
I can agree with that...

>>8122195
>regardless of how hard or easy it is,
easy isn't the opposite of hard

>>8122111

They are not sciences.

>>8122241
Difficult or simple*

Happy?

File: Buddy-Christ-kevin-smith-70822_360_640.jpg (49KB, 360x640px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 360x640px

>>8122195
>Its a really important and useful topic
It's really no different from religion.
unfalsifiable, faith-based
passively accepted by the masses, fervently supported by a handful of ultra-faithful
opiate for the masses
every brand is different, yet all insist they're the "one true faith"

>>8122283
What you are saying would also dismiss neuroscience, which is heavily based on "real" science (chemistry, biology...)

>>8122299
>What you are saying would also dismiss neuroscience, which is heavily based on "real" science (chemistry, biology...)
>>8122283
>fervently supported by a handful of ultra-faithful

As you point out, neuroscience is heavily based on chemistry and biology.
Yet psychology isn't.

OP here. What is the hardest social/soft science. To get the thread rerailed.

>>8122283
WOW U ARE SO 3DGY SUMMERFAG

>>8122283
>opiate for the masses
ouch.