http://undergrad.pbsci.ucsc.edu/phy sics/apphbs/apphbs-requirements.htm

>>8121195
I'm not sure what makes this 'applied.' It covers the basics of a phyics undergrad, if not a little light on electives/special topics. If you want to sell the title 'applied,' you should consider some internships during your summers, or maybe doing research in an engineering/experimental lab that focuses more on design or instrumentation than fundamental science.

>>8121226
so I'd just be cucking myself if a chose that over pure physics? would I be better off with computational maths or electrical engineering or something?

Applied physics is called Engineering.

>>8121292
are you saying to just do an engineering degree if I wanted "applied physics" or that that degree will essentially pass as an engineering degree in the eyes of employers. if the former, which kind of engineering is closest?

>>8121299
There isn't an engineering that is close to physics. Mech eng has the mechanics parts, elec eng has electromagnetism/optics but it's much more limited. Chem eng has some of the quantum but it's rushed over. Structural has a lot of monkeys eating each other's shit

>>8121365
what about AeroE/nukeE? so applied physics would be a legitimate pathway if one wants to study physics but be more employable? is it tantamount to "engineering physics"? basically I want to study physics like a physics major but end up in life like I majored in engineering .. make it happen for me

>>8121388
Just do physics undergrad, then engineering grad. Ezpz

>>8121411
didn't know that was a thing; thanks for solving my life anon

>>8121430
>>8121411

And not be able to get your PE and not be able to get hired in some states as an engineer. Some states require a bachelors in engineering to do it. A masters won't work.

>>8122389
>Not living in europe