What is the probability of technology singularity being

Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2016-06-03 23:28:06 Post No.
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 1439313033639.png (1018KB, 1365x1242px) Image search: [Google]

1018KB, 1365x1242px

Anonymous 2016-06-03 23:28:06 Post No. [Report]

What is the probability of technology singularity being made in 50 years?

Anonymous 2016-06-03 23:30:56 Post No.8120315
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-03 23:30:56 Post No.8120315 [Report]

File: singularity.png (13KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 1000x1500px

>>8120308
0

Anonymous 2016-06-03 23:34:47 Post No.8120326
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-03 23:34:47 Post No.8120326 [Report]

>>8120315
Explain why you think that?

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:14:40 Post No.8120399
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:14:40 Post No.8120399 [Report]

File: 1463538630364.jpg (54KB, 760x598px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 760x598px

>>8120315
50/50

It either happens, or it doesn't.

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:18:09 Post No.8120405
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:18:09 Post No.8120405 [Report]

Not dude, but he's right, the technology singularity is crap.

If anything, the finite size of atoms and the speed of light will serve to impede any runaway intelligence.

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:26:48 Post No.8120421
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:26:48 Post No.8120421 [Report]

>>8120399
I thought chinks were good at math.

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:36:09 Post No.8120435
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:36:09 Post No.8120435 [Report]

>>8120308
Only when Ron Paul is President.
[spoiler]It's not happening.[/spoiler]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:40:42 Post No.8120441
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:40:42 Post No.8120441 [Report]

>>8120435
we're not gonna to prevent this

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:41:12 Post No.8120443
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:41:12 Post No.8120443 [Report]

>>8120399
More like it must happen, but the probability is so infinitely small that we are unlikely to observe it.

>>8120405
Not to be That Asshole, but theoretically, shouldn't quantum entanglement allow for FTL information transfer.

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:46:23 Post No.8120454
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 00:46:23 Post No.8120454 [Report]

>>8120443
> quantum entanglement allow for FTL information transfer
brainlet detected

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:08:36 Post No.8120490
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:08:36 Post No.8120490 [Report]

>>8120443
>shouldn't quantum entanglement allow for FTL information transfer.
No. No it doesn't.
That's Deepak Chopra level bs.

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:41:25 Post No.8120546
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:41:25 Post No.8120546 [Report]

It's probable to happen

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:53:25 Post No.8120580
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:53:25 Post No.8120580 [Report]

>>8120443
that's not how quantum entanglement works ya big dingdong

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:58:01 Post No.8120585
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:58:01 Post No.8120585 [Report]

>>8120580
Bu... but, mah singoolarity!

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:59:16 Post No.8120590
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 01:59:16 Post No.8120590 [Report]

>>8120315
Nice graph man, I'm convinced

Anonymous 2016-06-04 02:01:32 Post No.8120594
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 02:01:32 Post No.8120594 [Report]

>>8120454
>>8120490
>>8120580
You are all correct and I am retarded. I really should have finished reading that book...

Anonymous 2016-06-04 02:04:48 Post No.8120600
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 02:04:48 Post No.8120600 [Report]

>>8120315
Isn't it truly amazing that /sci/ was able to predict the Trump presidency all the way back in 2013?

Anonymous 2016-06-04 07:17:33 Post No.8121144
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-04 07:17:33 Post No.8121144 [Report]

>>8120405
>If anything, the finite size of atoms and the speed of light will serve to impede any runaway intelligence.

>neurons are considerably larger than atoms
>the fastest neurons communicate at 70-100 miles per second; light speed is well over 1000x faster

A runaway intelligence only has to be smarter and think faster than the most brilliant human and possess the ability to self-improve...

Anonymous 2016-06-05 06:19:27 Post No.8123212
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-05 06:19:27 Post No.8123212 [Report]

File: FB_IMG_1463271649325.jpg (49KB, 640x649px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x649px

>>8120315
>disagreeing with the director of engineering at Google Ray kurzweil.
>believing you're intelligent

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/