>classical physics: a particle is a little ball >quantum

not a monkey

Just embarrassing how divided physicists are

physicsfags btfo
literally bio-tier

Very small objects can cause confusion and create divisions between people.

But I'm sure you're already aware of this.

File: 1461430411300.jpg (107KB, 580x346px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 580x346px

Lmao

Physicists on suicide alert

Topkek

Why haven't physicists offed themselves yet?

>>8044281
The last one contains all the previous ones, it's a generalization

ITT: OP talks to himself.

Are you having a fun?

File: 2016-05-01_19-54-05.png (2KB, 100x60px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 100x60px

>>8044383
>I don't know how to use 4chan: the post

>>8044286
apes are monkeys you anti-intellectual

>>8044281
So get busy trying to unify this theories in a way that works, faggot.

Just because physics is infinitely more complicated than your shitty science doesn't mean anything

File: 1461059539242.jpg (130KB, 832x690px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 832x690px

Physicists are brainlets compared to the mathematics master race

>>8044471
>why don't you go and our job for us because we suck so bad

kekkkkkkkkkkkkk
physicsmajorsbtfo

>>8044281
>is
Yeah no nobody claims that.
Seeing a particle as a little baloon of mass accurately describes the world we live in at this scale.
At a smaller scale quantom THEORY works better to describe the world.
Physics isn't about "this is how it is" but more like wow if we theorise the existence of bosons our model of the universe is even more accurate relative to the real world.
Try fucking modeling macro physics with twelfe dimensional strings when balloons of mass works just fine

>>8045209
>replying seriously to a gorilla post

Remember to sage, report and hide.

>>8045456
OP, while looking like a shitpost, is a valid scientific question

File: 1442820277424.gif (10KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 420x420px

>mfw physicists had to invent stupid words like "gauge field" and "infinitesimal generator" because using the actual mathematical terminology of connections on principal bundles and Lie algebras is too scary for them

>>8048200
Easter?

>>8044281
>monkey.jpg
Triggered.

>>8048200
If you wanted to do everything in terms of a connection form you would have to be using pullbacks everywhere. What would be the benefit of that?

DELETE THIS FUCKING THREAD RIGHT NOW

>op attempts at epistemology
Fugggggg >:D

>>8048200
>Ehresmann connections confirmed too hard for physics fags

>>8044281
it's a ball, QM QFT and string theory are memes.

Why won't the Janny delete this thread