sci if you could throw out mathemeticians like pokeballs to win arguments for you, who would you choose for the proof that
0.999... does not equal 1
>>8017327
NJ WILD FUCKING BERGER
Ted Cruz
the guy that proved 2+2=jesus
>>8017327
Abraham Robinson
>>8017327
Pythagoras
Terrence Howard
>>8017506
I get it
I get the joke
>>8017478
>>8017327
Zeno, obviously
>>8017327
If you want to get a brainlet to understand this, it's not about the proof, it's about fixing their misconceptions. Laymen don't know that ... means it keeps going forever, they assume it's like 10 or maybe a thousand more nines and that's where the confusion comes from.
>>8018441
Virtually all of the usual bait problems posted around these parts rely on some kind of semantic ambiguity (whether real or only perceived by some nontrivial art of the audience is secondary) in their phrasing which then guarantees discord and endless quarrels amongst those who choose to reply.
>>8018441
People who don't agree that it equal one either subconciously interpret [math]0.99999...[math] as some partial sum of [math]\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{\frac{9}{10^{-n}}}[/math] for an arbitrary large yet still finite [math]n[/math], or they employ the concept of infinitesimals and believe it's infinitesimally smaller than [math]1[/math] (which is really equivalent to the former case).
>>8017327
Well, apparently not Wolfram.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=0.999...
>>8018687
Wolfram does agree faggot
>>8017327
There is no proof because it is not true. Surprise, decimal expansions are not unique.
>>8018680
They are assuming decimal expansions are unique. This is why rigor is necessary.
my calculus professor bcuz she is the smart!