Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1459646321251.jpg (65KB, 550x512px) Image search:
[Google]
65KB, 550x512px
> Gauss works with complex numbers, topology, differential geometery
> century passes
> peano fucks around with goddamn arithmetic
> barely even multiplication, let alone subtraction or division
> only works on extremely limited set, fuck complex, fuck transcendental, fuck irrational, fuck negatives, fuck even fractions!
> treated on the same level as Gauss by some
Seriously, his proofs are beyond retarded, using that S(n) notation as if it has any use whatsoever. No, 3 isn't a thing, it's S(S(S(0)))! We all know people are going to write it as S^3(0), then eventually just 3. And goddamn, it's not like we fucking needed to know what 3 was! This dumbass is like the SJW of math, tittering around about stupid insignificant shit that has no usefulness in society, when people are already light years ahead. Sorry peano, maybe if you were in the stone age, you could have been useful, when we couldn't fucking count the layers of shit in our matted asshole hair without your S notation, but we are way beyond that.
>>
>I don't understand the foundational crisis in mathematics
>Rigor is a meme
>>
>>7977784
> mfw all the math before it still stayed valid despite this """"groundbreaking"""" discover of addition and multiplication, now in with rigor(tm)
>>
>>7977758
Yes, the foundation crisis was the autism period of mathematics. Still, nobody's proven P?NP so it's not like we're any closer to getting past Godel's notion of incompleteness.
>>
>>7977789
Imagine if it hadn't. It's good to be certain that we're not doing dumb shit.
>>
>>7977758
So much this. I can't stand all these reddit fedoratards who think they're so deep and such math nerds for questioning to prove 1+1=2.
>>
>>7977899
Of course it didn't because he didn't do anything groundbreaking or amazing, he just defined something already defined for centuries and so simple a kindergartener gets it intuitively.
He uses the exact same rules for his addition and multiplication, but shrouds it in complex sounding jargon. If there were any issues, they would have been found before, or not at all, because his "rules" are redundant.
>>
>>7977936
>he doesn't think generalized math is the greatest achievement of this millennium
pleb detected
>>
>>7977793
>Doesn't know that the formalization of mathematics in the early 1900s was the basis of countless huge breakthroughs in compatibility.
>doesn't know that Gödel's incompleteness theorems were the result of this work as well.
You are literally retarded.
>>7978230
>thinks formal logic, formal axiomatic systems, and formal proofs are jargon.
Hahaha wow, gb2/lit/ you humanities retard.
>>
>>7977758
>>7977784
>>7977789
>>7977793
>>7977899
>>7977936
>>7978230
>>7979895
>>7979940
DAVID HILBERT IS LITERALLY THE CANCER THAT HAS KILLED MATHEMATICS THAT SHIT EATING KRAUT KILLED THE RAPID PACE OF MATHEMATICAL DISCOVERY IF NOT FOR FUCKING SHILLBERT WE'D BE COLONIZING ANDROMEDA BY NOW LOOK IT UP WWW.HILBERTFUCKSANDROMEDA.COM
>>
>>7979952
lel
on the one hard, there might be a point behind this. on the other, Hilberts influence of course pushed math forward too - even if he had only did his Problems at the turn of the century
>>
>>7979952
David Hilbert may be bad, but is he Thomas Midgley Jr. bad?
Thread posts: 12
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1