Why haven't you looked over Newton's handwritten notes in Cambridge's online collection /sci/? Or do you prefer Leibniz?
>>7977407
>Newton
>a "genius"
>all he did was solve baby calculus
smhtbh
>>7977581
Who would win in a fight, Newton or Rudin?
>>7977604
Rudin would leave the fight as an exercise for the reader
what exactly am I looking at in that pic?
doesn't look like any calculus I've ever done
oh right, that's because we use Leibniz' notation like every non-Anglo-analytical-autist (AAA) out there
>>7977617
kek
>>7977617
I think I just had a trans-dimensional kek; thank you anon.
>>7977917
>using Leibniz notation
>>7978922
the joke has been used a countless number of times. it's not good, it's stale
>>7978956
I don't understand why people say this. Not everyone here is the same person. People see different shit in the same place. It's like saying that a joke was already told in this room before. Not everyone was in that room foo
>>7979409
Remember anon, the only posters here are you and that other guy.
>>7977917
>using Leibniz notation above the age of 16
>Not using a mixture of Newton and Euclid notation
>>7979667
>Euclid
kek sorry i meant Euler
>>7979669
>not using Euclid's notation
Plebs
>>7977617
I laughed.
>>7979686
I'm trying to imagine what Euclid would have thought if he knew about modern topology. Would have blown the fuck out of his poor little Greek mind.
>>7979697
>implying you could, with the resources of Euler, derive everything he did
I don't even know you, but I really hope you're not this delusional.