I have a question /sci/ I understand the brain operates on waves

>>7977320
Technically, yes. But the devices you'd need to be hooked up to would be in contact with your head. Not just some signal beamed in from somewhere else like a radio signal. It'd need to essentially map out your brain and stimulate it on a 3D grid. It'd work kind of like the way zapping cancer does with radiation, with multiple sources of signal hitting one point from different directions to help prevent false positives.

>>7977320
This sounds like a thread for >>>/x/.
But yes, in theory.

Best you wear a motorcycle helmet covered in tinfoil if you want to be safe while sleeping

>>7977326
This basically.
But it isn't possible with present day technology. We're probably hundreds of years away from even the most basic prototype.

>>7977320
Not directly, but remote electronic mood control has been experimentally verified. Dr. Bernard J. Eastlund about his 'mood control' patents: The government will say it isn't so, but if it quacks like a duck and it looks like a duck, there's a good chance it is a duck.

File: Just another anon.png (9KB, 679x427px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 679x427px

>>7977941
>But it isn't possible with present day technology. We're probably hundreds of years away from even the most basic prototype.

>>7977973
Effecting people's mood electronically from a remote location is ultra easy. /b/ does it every day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_resonance_imaging