What is the consensus on /sci/ regarding people with intellectual

>>7974844
>Intellectual disability
>It is defined by an IQ score under 130

kek, well played. But yes, we should ban the brainlet for all forms of high office and anything above menial labour [spoiler]until we can replace them with robots [/spoiler]

Probably they should be encouraged to spend their time on websites like 4chan or Reddit, so that they don't unnecessarily burden normal people.

>>7974844
They should be sterilised if they're not already, and allowed to do what they want but not given any advantages

File: twitter_400x400.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 400x400px

that's nice OP, but why dont you check out these two

>>7974844
>intellectual disability
do not let the retards breed
NO BREETARD

>>7975439
This, you don't have to kill them. Just don't let them breed. They can do useful construction work for the coming utopia in the meantime.

>>7974845
Another good one is
>Intellectual disability affects about 97-98% of the general population

>>7975439
99.9% of our population are retards.

>>7975618
:^)