Is maths the better physics? Can the entirety of physics be explained

fuck this guy and his dumb shit face

physics is basically using math to describe the world

>empirical science
I don't know m8

File: photo.jpg (60KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 900x900px

>>7947588
>he doesnt think that the universe can be explained by the number 5
>he doesnt want to taste james grimes sweat

Why go on /sci/ if youre not convinced by the power of mathematics?

This guy has a shiny face.

>>7947585

I met this guy when he came to Australia

his gf is hot as fuck

>>7947610
This ťbh

File: 23f.png (156KB, 500x272px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 500x272px

>physicists will understand algebraic topology, bifurcation theory, differential geometry, convexity, spectral theory, nonstandard analysis, tensors, stochastic PDEs, Catastrophe Theory, 4-Manifolds, Large Cardinals, and Representation Theory.
>mathfags will never understand crystallography, solid state/condensed matter, quantum mechanics, phase spaces, chemical vapor deposition, induction heating, electronic structure theory, neuromorphic Memristors, lattice gauge theory, plasma physics, ion assisted film growth, solitons, acoustic metamaterials and phonon crystals, stokes theorem, QFT of many body systems, and fluid mechanics

you can't make this shit up

>>7949478
Unless, of course, you fucking study those things.

>>7949478
>stokes theorem
I don't know about the rest but I definitely disagree with this.

>>7949478
>quantum mechanics
What is linear algebra and Hermitian operators. You dumb cunt. We made that fucking field.

Math will work autonomously without physics or any other field, whereas physics is dependent on math.

>>7949504
>We made that feild

no you didn't. comparing QM to linear algebra and hermitian operators is like comparing Grey's Anatomy to your shitty doodle of a penis. it didn't even scratch the surface until physicists like Max Planck came around and slathered your burnt steak in his intellectual ketchup to save it.

>>7949509
You need Hermitian operators to model uncertainty. Are you new? Undergrad?

>>7949478
What the hell kind of mathematician doesn't know Stokes' Theorem?

File: bear.png (1MB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x800px

>>7949504
>We made that fucking field.
>We
>Mfw some retarded undergrad tries to claim credit for the accomplishments of some of the brightest minds in the 20th century, all on a Tibetan loom weaving board

>>7949515
>You need Hermitian operators to model uncertainty.

false. you don't NEED it per se, and you can't prove such.

>>7949504
>We

WE WUZ QUANTUMZ N SHIT

>>7949504
Mathematics is a language, not a science.
"You" are as responsible for Quantum Mechanics as the man who made the hammer and nails is responsible a wooden cabin.

>>7949509
>comparing Grey's Anatomy
>Grey's Anatomy
>Grey
Tell me more about how you read the most prestigeous book about anatomy and didn't waste your time with shitty TV shows.