>year2.016 multiplied by ten to the power of 3 >people

I don't think anyone actively believes in newtonian gravity do they? Are there people who go out of their way to deny that it's just an approximation?

>>7851603
I think it's ignorance. Most people don't know about general relativity, and whatever doubt informed people had can't exist anymore, now that g waves being the final nail in the coffin of newtonian gravity.

File: plant.jpg (935KB, 1920x1920px) Image search: [Google]

935KB, 1920x1920px

>>7851570
1. There's no such thing as "newtonian gravity". There are newtonian models of the effect of gravity, but they make no attempt at explaining gravity itself.
2. Classical mechanics is (and will always be) a good enough approximation for many cases. There's no need to use more complex models in those cases.
3. Most people have no use knowing about mathematical models of gravity, it would just be a waste of their time (and society's time if you want everyone to learn it)
4. I doubt your knowledge goes beyond pop-sci anyways
5. Meanwhile most people know how to cook a nice 3 course meal and get laid and you don't. Why are you so ignorant?
In conclusion you're worse than the people who are "ignorant" because you are too but still think you're smart.

>>7851620
So you're just mad that not everyone knows advanced physics or what? Why do you care?

>>7851570
>Newtonian gravity

Scientists haven't used Newtonian gravity for hundred of years. Even without GR, they still don't use Newtonian gravity. They use Hamiltonian mechanics and shit. Have for hundreds of years. Step up your game OP.

>>7851620
Newtonian gravity died in the 1800's dumb ass

>>7851673
Doesn't it seem odd that people willing believe in an incorrect theory, no less the theory that explains how they don't drift off the planet they are on?
>>7851639
>There's no such thing as "newtonian gravity". There are newtonian models of the effect of gravity, but they make no attempt at explaining gravity itself.
Forgive me then, I should've stated the newtonian theory of gravity.
>2. Classical mechanics is (and will always be) a good enough approximation for many cases. There's no need to use more complex models in those cases.
If we taught genereal relativity young enough, should it not be as easy as newtonian mechanics?
>4. I doubt your knowledge goes beyond pop-sci anyways
I did not claim to have knowledge beyon pop-sci knowledge
>5. Meanwhile most people know how to cook a nice 3 course meal and get laid and you don't. Why are you so ignorant?
Irrelevant but social personality disorder and aspergers. I know how to cook three-course meals for your information.
>In conclusion you're worse than the people who are "ignorant" because you are too but still think you're smart.
worse is all subjective. I did not claim to be smart in my post either. Why are you making assumptions? I am smarter than the average people.

>>7851707
>>7851703
I was referring to the general population, if it wasn't evident in my post.

>>7851715
>I should've stated the newtonian theory of gravity.
That's wrong too. You apparently don't even know what a scientific theory is.
>should it not be as easy as newtonian mechanics?
No, because the math is much harder. You don't even have high-school level physics knowledge or you would know this.
Also, again, for what purpose would we teach this?
>social personality disorder and aspergers.
So then why don't you work on that instead of shitting your brain up with pop-sci you don't even understand you ignorant fuck
>I am smarter than the average people.
top lel

>>7851740
A lot of what people believe to be hard is only because they believe it to be. A few aspects of quantum mechanics, particle physics are not particularly difficult concepts. Take the photo electric effect for example.
>So then why don't you work on that instead
>work on mental disorders
Shiggy
>top lel
It is true.

File: asuka pepe.jpg (3KB, 121x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 121x125px

>>7851759
>It is true.
Let me guess. Another IQ elitist. I bet you also believe in the le smart but lazy meme

>>7851782
>le smart but lazy meme
An individual can have a low work ethic but be intelligent.
>Another IQ elitist
I actually got my IQ from a published source, not an online site that gives you 140+ if you answer basic maths questions

>>7851793
And yet your mind is not powerful enough to guide your behavior to do something better with your finite time than convince degenerates on the internet of how smart you are.

>>7851820
>better
Oh my sweet summer child
better is all too subjective. There is very rarely an objective "better".
If this is what I do with my finite time then so be it. But you are doing exactly the same as "I do": convince degenerates on the internet of how smart you are

>>7851759
>A few aspects of quantum mechanics, particle physics are not particularly difficult concepts
that's because you watch youtube videos of black science man. You don't actually know anything
>It is true.
top lel

>>7851831
Except I do, since I studied it age 14.
>>It is true.
>>top lel
Personal incredulity is a logical fallacy. ou would know that if you were as smart as I am.

>>7851836
>I studied it age 14.
>I did not claim to have knowledge beyon pop-sci knowledge
>If we taught genereal relativity young enough, should it not be as easy as newtonian mechanics?
I don't know what the fuck you "studied" but you obviously don't know shit.

>>7851838
A-level as level, and university level physics textbooks based on the subject. What do you know? Very little.

File: 1452562118120.png (790KB, 960x1050px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 960x1050px

>>7851836
So mister IQ, explain to me Banach spaces

>>7851844
Not my job to educate you
>If you don't know EVEYTHING of every field of a vastly complex subject, you know nothing!
Where did I mention that I studied functional analysis again?

File: lalalal.png (1MB, 730x941px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 730x941px

>>7851841
You still obviously don't know shit, so either you've got amnesia or you're a pathetic internet liar.
What's the first order condition of x!.
This is trivial to anyone claiming what you claim

File: 1452562580450.png (195KB, 283x413px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 283x413px

>>7851850
if you studied quantum mechanics when you were 14, you should this math.

>>7851850
pathetic.

>>7851715
>If we taught genereal relativity young enough, should it not be as easy as newtonian mechanics?

Hahahahaha! Fuck no you dumb fuck, GR is hard solely due to the highly non-linear equations that come from it, meaning that even the simpler results take a shit load of effort. Add onto that the required mathematical background (differential geometry) and then the background needed for that. Compare this to Newtonian mechanics, where linearity is relatively easy to achieve and the most complex piece of mathematics you need is the knowledge to solve baby's first ode.

The idea that all you need to do is teach it earlier and it would magically become simpler stinks of someone who has never studied GR at all.

File: m4K2DFr.jpg (33KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x333px

>>7851885
b-bu muh black science man s-said all you need to do is imagine two spaceships flying towards each other

File: rei.jpg (60KB, 450x557px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 450x557px

>>7851855
Brave New World and 1984 are both very interesting novels.
>This is trivial to anyone claiming what you claim
Only in your opinion
>>7851859
I studied it yes, but I did not major or get a degree in it. It was a hobby that I went a little in depth to. Remind me again where functional analysis is in quantum mechanics?
I know you are a literal tard because of all your asuka-posting, literally worst girl. Not even tsundere, just a cold bitch. Asuka a shit.

>>7851885
Why do you think asians have a typically higher intelligence than most races? The schools and parents place a lot of pressure on to the student to learn challenging material. This is only an example, but with time we can get to that level. Except with GR.

>>7851937
>Remind me again where functional analysis is in quantum mechanics?

Hahahaha, holy shit.

>What is a Hilbert space.

>>7851956
>clearly has no idea what he is talking about
Go pleb somewhere else
Reminder that you are STILL replying to me and not doing something better with your finite time than convince degenerates on the internet of how smart you are.

File: How_to_spot_a_popsci_memer.png (54KB, 1083x332px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1083x332px

>>7851966
>Tells someone else they don't know what they're talking about
>Doesn't know where functional analysis comes up in QM

kek, also caped for future edification.

>>7851937
>Only in your opinion
Yes, and angles are only important in trigonometry in my opinion
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAAHAHHAHA

>>7851985
Jokes on you kid, I was only pretending to be retarded ;^))))
>>7851995

>>7851937
Imagine if we could ban these people from the internet.
/x/ would vanish

File: 1454709577793.jpg (552KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 800x800px

>>7851937
so much envy. Kid, look, you do not need to be this way. I can buy you a rope if you want.

File: jay_jay_the_jet_plane_saying_aw_shit_nigga_by_larka11080099-d5yt6el.jpg (50KB, 500x294px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x294px

>>7851937
>Only in your opinion
>Remind me again where functional analysis is in quantum mechanics?
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahahahahhaahahah

File: How to spot a redditor.png (203KB, 1264x520px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1264x520px

>>7852000
>>7851985
Screencapped for future edification :^)
I bet you SC'ed for the sake of posting it to reddit, where you belong, not on a board for intellectual discussion.

File: 128463125421.png (101KB, 846x608px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 846x608px

>>7852007
>forwardslashsciforwardslash
>a board for intellectual discussion.
This just gets better and better

>>7852001
>asukafag
>having a valid opinion about anything
>ever
>>7852003
I thought /sci/ was full of actual intellectuals
Stop pretending you know what you're talking about
>>7852010

File: MFW.png (603KB, 817x548px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 817x548px

>>7852013
>get rekt on 4chan
>completely anonymous
>still can't just let it go and resorts to shitposting and desperate damage control because this actually matters to him

File: 1452564061308.jpg (54KB, 240x430px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 240x430px

>>7852013
stay mad kid. Now I'm curious. What did you major in exactly?

>>7852067
Do you really think he even graduated high school?

File: 1454128574349.jpg (273KB, 699x1000px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 699x1000px

>>7852091
Because i expect anyone on this board to have at least higher education. But maybe you are right.

>>7852110
>i expect anyone on this board to have at least higher education.
lol no, not even close. Lurk moar