So could one say that existence is composed of indefinite energy

One could say that, but that does not make it true... or comprehensible.

File: tumblr_mhcc5nER4K1ribnwko1_500.gif (262KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 500x280px

Let me elaborate...

...in the conviction of indefinite energy in that it is continuation is of an elaborate extension of a baseline proponents of existence and that this is manifest by the cause of what is composed by the deciphering of exponentiation in nothing, as to say the succession of everything (one being total the other being only ever partial) and that the impulse of the conspicuous nature of the fact that when indefinite energy is in play, such as in everything, that the only real conclusion is that when the suspension of time, a 'relative' and related to nothing, is in the discord of energy creates a syntax of components of the fracture in the deciphering which is what causes the uni 'deficit' to be outlined and that the stability of existence is faced with as critical in the face of elementary information delegations being outlined and left misapplied to the extent of a realignment being so random, in the nature of observance via new constructions, that the conclusion of the context of the outline be so distressed in the 'innate' sentience, or larger scope of coherent organizational and organized principles, that the exponentiation be confined only by expansion.

And that's my argument for why relativity is irregular.... one of them anyway

>>7803253
I thought about this problem last semester while I was working with a turboencabulator for my research project

>>7803550
>let me elaborate
>jerks off into alphabet soup
>calls it language

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (101KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1280x720px

You come here like every day posting incomprehensible pseudostoner metaphysics. Don't you get tired of it? What do you do other than shitpost on 4chan?

>>7803550
>Let me elaborate...
Please don't.