Why doesn't the United State follow the English Rule of

File: bateman2.jpg (15KB, 188x218px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 188x218px

>>5619999
QUADS

>>5619999
because losers don't have money and they just get incarcerated and they never get their cash and just collect bad karma.

File: CHECK EM.webm (753KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

753KB, 640x480px

>>5619999
QUESTIONING QUADS! wooh!

>>5619999
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.

>>5620035
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.

>>5620035
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620048
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.

>>5620035
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620048
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.
>>5620052
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.

>>5620035
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620048
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.

>>5620035
>>5620035
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620048
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.
>>5620052
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
That sounds counterproductive. Presumably, in labor disputes, there usually is a very asymmetrical position between employers and employees.
>>5620060
>>5620035
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620048
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.

>>5620005
because losers don't have money and they just get incarcerated and they never get their cash and just collect bad karma.
>>5620065
because losers don't have money and they just get incarcerated and they never get their cash and just collect bad karma.
>>5620060
It depends on the procedure. In Germany, e. g., in labor law both parties share the costs equally, but in family or criminal law the loser pays them. In civil law, however, the judges decide about how the costs are shared.
>>5620065
LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620072
LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620072
>Sun
I live in Africa

>>5620048
The German labor law is very simple and the most conditions are negotiated between labor unions and employers' associations. The most claims are dismissal protection suits.

>>5620084
>>5620091
>I live in Africa
My parents are Hermaphrodites.

>>5620091
The German labor law is very simple and the most conditions are negotiated between labor unions and employers' associations. The most claims are dismissal protection suits.
>>5620092
>My parents are Hermaphrodites.
Your parents are Hermaphrodites.

>>5620092
The German labor law is very simple and the most conditions are negotiated between labor unions and employers' associations. The most claims are dismissal protection suits.
>>5620065
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
>>5620095
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
>>5620092
>in labor law both parties share the costs equally
My parents are Hermaphrodites.

>>5620084
>Sun
I live in Africa
>>5620095
The most claims are dismissal protection suits. The most claims are dismissal protection suits. The most claims are dismissal protection suits. LOLE I live in Africa

File: america_tbh.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

because americans are not losers like the rest of the """"civilized world""""

>>5620105
You live in Africa. The most claims are dismissal protection suits. like the rest of the """"civilized world"""" n labor law is very simple and the most conditions are negotiated >Sun I ive in Africa Hermaphrodites

>>5620092
>>5620095
>>5620102
>>5620104
>>5620105
>>5620109
QUESTIONING QUADS! wooh! new mot 07/25/17(Tue)14:49:01 No.5620001

>>5620109
>You live in Africa.
You live in Turkey.

>>5620117
what is are quads

>>5620124
>You live in Turkey.
>You live in Africa.
You live in Turkey.
>>5620124
what is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quadswhat is are quads

>>5619999
>>5620001
>>5620005
>>5620006
>>5620035
>>5620048
>>5620052
>>5620054
>>5620060
>>5620065
>>5620072
>>5620076
>>5620084
>>5620091
>>5620092
>>5620095
>>5620102
>>5620104
>>5620105
>>5620109
>>5620117
>>5620124
>>5620127
i like memeing

>>5620131
LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620131
LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620131
>LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620137
>>5620143
>>5620146
THIS!!!!!!!!

>>5620131
i like m ekil i

>>5620137
>>5620143
>lole
>loli
are you an pedofail

Your fortune: ｷﾀ━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!

>>5620150
no silly, LOLE is LOL but moar ironic!!
get with the times grandpa

>>5620153
>lol
>loli
oh no not you too

>>5620155
dubs of confusion

>>5620158
¿why are you think i am confuse?
¿are you an duck?

>>5620170
i'm memeing you so hard right now and u dont even realize!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>5620171
what you dont't realise is that you are, infact, the one who that is actually being memed

>>5620179
pfft you think you are reverse-memeing the memer but i am in fact memeing the reverse-memer attempting to meme the memer

>>5620184
mememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememememe

>>5620091
>labor unions
These tend not to exist in shitholes like the US or they tend not to work in shitholes Latin America.

>>5619999
>>5620005
>>5620035
>>5620048
>>5620091
>>5620212
>>>/pol/

utterly fascin8ing
>>5620214
.....................nah