Just curious; maybe im being paranoid.....
>>5327558
I'd post on [s4s]
The banana sauntered into my room. It's peel falls to the ground, and the moonlight greets it's shape. "It's yours if you want it" We made love that night for the second time, and I slept soundly with it in my arms
>>5327568
Literally this. The only way to protect internet privacy is to create so much "junk" content that it becomes impossible or impractical to store and process all the information passing through the internet.
>>5327641
straight up
i would just enjoy the fact that they watch porn with me and know the exact time of ejaculation.
(about 30 secconds before i close out the porn
Always look at goatse.cx
>>5327558
make posts berating them about the time and resources they're wasting on a strategically irrelevent target at tax payers expense and point out that they probably didn't get into law enforcement to be a net surfing desk jockey and other people everywhere have much more personally fulfilling jobs
>>5327558
Stop being paranoid.
We don't watch you guys.
*Spams NSA with free Runescape subscriptions*
>>5327558
I would troll them by posting nothing but anime, the confusion will eventually leave them uninterested in my affairs...
>>5327641
i was thinking more just like "lole u r watch ing me? watch me shitpost F B I
*BRRRRAAAAAAPPPPPPPPP*
there isn't an officer looking through your faggot trap porn. They have search engines that index relevant information and then look at it if they want to
>>5327804
and if they have shit on you they may hack you to know what you're doing
>>5327804
I work at a place that would like to know more about this. Is it verifiable by public information?
I would post chaos magick sigils to hack their minds.
>>5327812
lolw like this?
>>5327804
it's actually more like this but with everyone on the internet's browsing shown in real time on a screen each and one guy has to watch all of them at once
>>5327808
it should work more or less like that from the Snowden and wikileaks stuff. It's all on the internet
>>5327828
gotta prove that wikileaks is not a psyop
~Psy~Op~
I would make a really hard sum that they would talk around the watercooler about something like
[n@sa] = X-1
Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again
then tweet them
B
A
V
I