If two spaceship we're flying in opposite direction at half speed of light, they're speed relative to each other would be speed of light. If you synchronize clocks on each ship at start, fly apart for 10 year then what time would it be on each ship?
benis in bagina xDD
>>5113843
6 oclock
>>5113843
the time at the start plus 10 years duh
>>5113864
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
4:20
>>5113843
You couldnt compare the two clocks because they are 20 lightyears away
>>5113843
But wait what if they go above 0.5C that would be faster than sped of lite which is unruly!!
>>5114188
their speed relative each other is not the speed of light because of time dilation, the faster you move in relation to some point in space the slower time will propagate in relation to time in that point
>>5113843
5 years later.
if each ship was numberd after a relative time line it would be r1 + r2 = 10 light years in a straight line.
https://youtu.be/9C0SeDenPRo49
https://youtu.be/I6Q3C5NleC0
Your fortune: ( ´_ゝ`)フーン
>>5114980
https://youtu.be/fh_Lp-35dEg
https://youtu.be/GPria4lrLRc1142eatmeass
Your fortune: Better not tell you now
>>5115002
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
>>5113843
" they're speed relative to each other would be speed of light"
no thts wrong
>>5115010
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
>>5114977
this is in fact wrong
>>5115117
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
>>5115010
What would it be? I did SR like a year ago, but it makes sense to me. From the perspective of one ship the other would be going the speed of light.
>>5115132
uhh no?
>I did SR
so use the formula for parallel velocities you hack
v(a) = 0.5c
v(b) = -0.5c
v=v(b)-v(a)/(1-v(a)*v(b)/c^2)
=> (-0.5c-0.5c)/(1+0.25) = c/1.25 = 0.8c
>>5115201
Did you just insult my grand mother ?
>>5115201
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
>>5115207
it's open to interpretation
>>5115212
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
>>5115201
This is one level of irony too much
>>5115234
sorry, I don't read posts by namefigs ツ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2-oosXNA4c
Your fortune: Bad Luck
>>5115201
>parallel velocities
this was not nice to your answer. THEY are not in parrellel if they move in the opposite direction fro each other, this means they are in series and this is how they exist together at the beginning.
>>5115201
>you hack
Rude. I said I took it a yaer ago bc i dnt rember and was askign you.
>>5116055+
There is one line of distance between the spaceships that equals 10 light years after travelling at half speed of light 0.5 * 10 [5] but twice.
The line between the ships could be connected with a line and a bead (on the line) can go from one ship to the other using 1 direction , so they live in the same universe (they set the watch at the same place) so in series.
>>5116063
the absolute core of SR is the resulting time dilation (and lorentz contraction) at relativistic velocities yet you intuitively resorted to newtonian addition. it's like you don't even know what the R in SR stands for. it's very clear you're a lying hack and a fraud
>>5113843
for the observers on either spaceship, the time would be the same.
If they were to observe the other ship's clock, it would be likely be different